Elements of risk in qualitative research

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 163-174

  Hadjistavropoulos, Thomas ^a   Smythe, William E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Confidentiality; Ethics; Qualitative research; Third parties

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035625955     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327019EB1102_4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles for psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
2. Aubry v. Duclos, 141 D.L.R. (4th) 683 (Qc. Ct. App. 1996).
3. Balfour, G. (1999, February). How qualitative researchers manage ethical dilemmas: Investigating the connections between ethics and theory. Paper presented at the First Annual Conference on Advances in Qualitative Methods, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
4. Canadian Association of Social Workers. (1994). Social Work Code of Ethics. Ottawa: Author.
5. Canadian Psychological Association. (2000). Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists. Ottawa: Author.
6. Cowles, K. V. (1988). Issues in qualitative research on sensitive topics. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10, 163-179.
7. Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229.
8. Grafanaki, S. (1996). How research can change the researcher The need for sensitivity, flexibility and ethical boundaries in conducting qualitative research in counselling/psychotherapy. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24, 329-338.
9. Hadjistavropoulos, T., & Malloy, D. C. (1999). Ethical principles of the American Psychological Association: An argument for philosophical and practical ranking. Ethics & Behavior, 9, 127-140.
10. Josselson, R. (1996). On writing other people's lives: Self-analytic reflections of a narrative researcher. In R. Josselson (Ed.), The narrative study of lives: Vol. 4. Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives (pp. 60-71). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Malloy, D. C., & Hadjistavropoulos, T. (1998). A philosophical value analysis of the Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists. Canadian Psychology, 39, 187-193.
12. Mathews, J. (2000, January 12). Father's complaints shut down research: U.S. agencies act on privacy concerns. The Washington Post, p. B07.
13. McLeod, J. (1994). Doing counselling research. London: Sage.
14. McLeod, J. (1996). Qualitative approaches to research in counselling and psychotherapy: Issues and challenges. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24, 309-316.
15. Munhall, P. L. (1989). Ethical considerations in qualitative research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10, 150-162.
16. Raudonis, B. M. (1992). Pearls, pith, and provocation: Ethical considerations in qualitative research with hospice patients. Qualitative Health Research, 2, 238-249.
17. Seitz, J., & O'Neill, P. (1996). Ethical decision-making and the code of ethics of the Canadian Psychological Association. Canadian Psychology, 37, 21-30.
18. Sinclair, C., Poizner, S., Gilmour-Barrett, K., & Randall, D. (1987). The development of a code of ethics for psychologists. Canadian Psychology, 28, 1-8.
19. Smythe, W. E., & Murray, M. J. (2000). Owning the story: Ethical considerations in narrative research. Ethics & Behavior, 10, 311-336.
20. Tri-Council Working Group on Ethics. (1997). Code of ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa: Medical Research Council, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Social Science and Humanities Research Council.
21. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1994). Code of federal regulations Title 45 Part 46 Protection of Human Subjects. Retrieved May 1, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.med.umich.edu/irbmed/FederalDocuments/hhs/HHS45FR46