Voluntary development restrictions and the cost of habitat conservation

Real Estate Economics

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 191-206

  Lovell, Sabrina J ^a   Sunding, David L ^b  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035625952     PISSN: 10808620     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1080-8620.00007     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aiken, J.D. 1989. State Farmland Preferential Assessment Statutes. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Agricultural Research Division, Institute of Agric. and Natural Resources: Lincoln, NE.
2. Anderson, J.E. 1993. State Tax Credits and Land Use: Policy Analysis of Circuit-Breaker Effects. Resource and Energy Economics 15(3): 295-312.
3. Batie, S.S. and C.C. Mabbs-Zeno. 1985. Opportunity Costs of Preserving Coastal Wetlands: A Case Study of a Recreational Housing Development. Land Economics 61(1): 1-9.
4. California Department of Conservation. 1992. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. Sacramento County Important Farmland Map 1990. California Department of Conservation: Sacramento, CA.
5. California Department of Conservation. 1994.1991-1993 Williamson Act Status Report. California Department of Conservation: Sacramento, CA.
6. Capozza, D.R. 1990. The Stochastic City. Journal of Urban Economics 28(2): 187-203.
7. Capozza, D.R. and R.W. Helsley. 1989. The Fundamentals of Land Prices and Urban Growth. Journal of Urban Economics 26(3): 295-306.
8. Carter, H., A.D. Sokolow, G.E. Goldman, R. Maus, T.E. Sexton, J. Spezia and D. Strong. 1989. Land in the Balance: The Williamson Act Costs, Benefits, and Options. Part 1. (Prepared by the University of California, Agricultural Issues Center for the California Policy Seminar, commissioned by the California Department of Conservation, Office of Land Conservation.) California Department of Conservation Publications: Sacramento, CA.
9. Greene, W.H. 1995. Limdep Version 7.0. Econometric Software: Bellport, NY.
10. Holland, R.F. 1976. The Vegetation of Vernal Pools: A Survey. S. Jain, editor. Vernal Pools: Their Ecology and Conservation. University of California at Davis, Institute of Ecology Publication No. 9: Davis, CA.
11. Isé, Sabrina. 1997. Voluntary Programs for the Preservation of Agriculture and the Environment at the Urban Fringe. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
12. Jones and Stokes Associates, Inc. 1990. Sacramento County Vernal Pools: Their Distribution, Classification, Ecology and Management. Jones and Stokes Associates: Sacramento, CA.
13. McMillen, D.P. 1989. An Empirical Model of Urban Fringe Land Use. Land Economics 65(2): 138-145.
14. McMillen, D.P. and J.F. McDonald. 1989. Selectivity Bias in Urban Land Value Functions. Land Economics 65(4): 341-351.
15. Nagano, C. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1994. Personal Communication.
16. Natural Heritage Institute. 1998. Optimizing Habitat Conservation Planning on NonFederal Lands. Natural Heritage Institute: San Francisco, CA.
17. Parsons, G.R. and Y. Wu. 1991. The Opportunity Cost of Coastal Land-Use Controls: An Empirical Analysis. Land Economics 67(3): 308-316.
18. Shonkwiler, J.S. and J.E. Reynolds. 1986. A Note on the Use of Hedonic Price Models in the Analysis of Land Prices at the Urban Fringe. Land Economics 62(1): 58-63.
19. Sokolow, A.D. 1990. The Williamson Act: 25 Years of Land Conservation. California Department of Conservation: Sacramento, CA.
20. Swenson, D. (Sacramento County Assessors Office, California). 1996. Personal Communication.
21. U.S. Geological Survey. 1979-1980. California Quad Topographic Maps, DMA 1760 1 SW Series V895. 7.5 Minute Series.
22. U.S. Soil Conservation Service. 1993. Soil Survey of Sacramento County, CA. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture: Washington, DC.
23. Vitaliano, D.E. and C. Hill. 1994. Agricultural Districts and Farmland Prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 8(3): 213-223.