Standards for the Development and Use of Tests: The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 157-163

  Eignor, Daniel R ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational testing; Psychological testing; Testing standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035624079     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.157     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1966). Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1974). Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U. S. C. § 12101 et seq. (1990).
6. Brennan, R.L. (in press). An essay on the history and future of reliability from the perspective of replications. Journal of Educational Measurement.
7. Cole, N.A., & Zieky, M.J. (in press). The new faces of fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement.
8. Davidson, F. (2000). Review of Standards for educational and psychological testing (1999). Language Testing, 17, 457-462.
9. Dwyer, C.A. (2000, August). Validity: Theory into practice. Presidential address to Division 5 of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
10. Haney, W. (1993, April). Cheating and escheating on standardized tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of NCME, Atlanta, GA.
11. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Kane, M.T. (in press). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement.
13. Linn, R.L. (1993). Linking results of distinct assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 83-102.
14. Linn, R.L. (1997). Evaluating the validity of assessments: The consequences of use. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16, 5-8, 13, 24.
15. Menrens, W.A. (1997). The consequences of consequential validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16, 16-18.
16. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement, 3rd ed. (pp. 13-103.) New York: American Council on Education.
17. Moss, P.A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12.
18. Moss, P.A. (1996). Enlarging the dialog in educational measurement: Voices from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher, 25, 20-28.
19. Mislevy, R.L. (1993). Linking educational assessments: Concepts, issues, methods, and prospects. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center.
20. Phillips, S.E. (1994). High stakes testing accommodations: Validity versus disabled rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 93-120.
21. Phillips, S.E. (2000). GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency: Psychometric evidence. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 343-385.
22. Popham, W.J. (1997). Consequential validity: Right concern -wrong concept. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16, 9-13.
23. Shepard, L.A. (1997). The centrality of test use and consequences for test validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16, 5-8, 13, 24.