-
1
-
-
0346818863
-
-
Children Families and the Internet 2000, a survey of 1,735 parents of children aged 2-17, and 601 children aged 9-17 from the same households Grunwald Associates, 1793 Escalante Way, Burlingame, CA 94010
-
Children Families and the Internet 2000, a survey of 1,735 parents of children aged 2-17, and 601 children aged 9-17 from the same households. Grunwald Associates, 1793 Escalante Way, Burlingame, CA 94010. (www. grunwald. com)
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
0346188427
-
-
From the Statement for the Record of Louis J. Freeh, Director Federal Bureau of Investigation on Cybercrime Before the Senate Committee on Judiciary Subcommittee for the Technology, Terrorism, and Government Information,Washington, D.C. March 28
-
From the Statement for the Record of Louis J. Freeh, Director Federal Bureau of Investigation on Cybercrime Before the Senate Committee on Judiciary Subcommittee for the Technology, Terrorism, and Government Information,Washington, D.C. March 28, 2000. http://www.cybercrime.gov/rreeh328.htm.
-
(2000)
-
-
-
4
-
-
0347449554
-
The advent of the computer delinquent
-
December
-
Arthur L. Bowker, "The Advent of the Computer Delinquent," FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, Volume 69, No. 12 (December 2000): 7-11.
-
(2000)
FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin
, vol.69
, Issue.12
, pp. 7-11
-
-
Bowker, A.L.1
-
5
-
-
0347449541
-
-
Internet Integrity and Critical Infrastructure Protection Act of 2000. The bill, introduced by Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch of Utah, lost some of its strictest measures in the debate process, as some argued that its original guidelines would over-federalize many minor offenses. For example, the bill originally would have authorized federal prosecution of any juvenile accused of a felony computer crime. As amended, the bill calls for federal prosecution of juveniles only for the most serious offenses
-
Internet Integrity and Critical Infrastructure Protection Act of 2000. The bill, introduced by Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch of Utah, lost some of its strictest measures in the debate process, as some argued that its original guidelines would over-federalize many minor offenses. For example, the bill originally would have authorized federal prosecution of any juvenile accused of a felony computer crime. As amended, the bill calls for federal prosecution of juveniles only for the most serious offenses.
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
21844509527
-
Controlling computer access to pornography: Special conditions for sex offenders
-
June
-
Laura Davis, Marilyn D. McShane, and Frank P. Williams, III, "Controlling Computer Access to Pornography: Special Conditions for Sex Offenders," Federal Probation June 1995.
-
(1995)
Federal Probation
-
-
Davis, L.1
McShane, M.D.2
Frank, P.3
Williams F.P. III4
-
8
-
-
0348079758
-
-
Letter from David N. Adair, Jr. Associate General Counsel, to Mr. Joseph P. Brignone, U.S. Probation Officer, Buffalo, NY, dated March 17, 1998
-
Letter from David N. Adair, Jr. Associate General Counsel, to Mr. Joseph P. Brignone, U.S. Probation Officer, Buffalo, NY, dated March 17, 1998.
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
0347449553
-
Guidance on searches and seizures
-
April 9
-
David N. Adair, Jr., Associate General Counsel, "Guidance on Searches and Seizures," News and Views, Vol. XXVI, No.8 (April 9, 2001).
-
(2001)
News and Views
, vol.26
, Issue.8
-
-
Adair D.N., Jr.1
-
11
-
-
0346188400
-
-
ECPA updated title III, Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. It extends privacy protection to modern technologies and primarily impacts the wiretap statute 18 USC §§ 2510 - and stored communications access statute (18 USC §§ 2701 - http:/ /www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/ ch121.html#PC121 ). It was primarily designed to protect contents of electronic mail, voice mail, and remote computing services
-
ECPA updated title III, Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. It extends privacy protection to modern technologies and primarily impacts the wiretap statute (18 USC §§ 2510 - http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ 18/ch119.html#PC119 ) and stored communications access statute (18 USC §§ 2701 - http:/ /www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/ ch121.html#PC121 ). It was primarily designed to protect contents of electronic mail, voice mail, and remote computing services.
-
-
-
|