Advanced technology development program review - A US Department of the Navy case study

R and D Management

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 287-298

  Kostoff, Ronald N ^a   Miller, Robert ^b   Tshiteya, Rene ^b  

^a OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b DDL OMNI Engineering Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035620420     PISSN: 00336807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9310.00217     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. DOE, (1978) Evaluation of alternate magnetic fusion concepts 1977, DOE/ET-0047. US Department of Energy, Assistant Secretary for Energy Technology, Office of Fusion Energy, May.
2. DOE, (1982) An assessment of the basic energy sciences program, Office of Energy Research, Office of Program Analysis, Report No. DOE/ER-0123, March 1982.
3. Kostoff, R.N. (1997a) Peer review: the appropriate GPRA metric for research. Science, 277, 1 August.
4. Kostoff, R.N. (1997b) Research program peer review: principles, practices, protocols. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/ kostoff/index.html
5. Kostoff, R.N. (1997c) The principles and practices of peer review, in Stamps, A.E. (ed.), Science and Engineering Ethics, Special Issue on Peer Review, 3 I.
6. Kostoff, R.N. (1997d) The Handbook of Research Impact Assessment, http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/kostoff/index.html
7. Kostoff, R.N. (1998) GPRA science and technology peer review. SciCentral, www.scicentral.com
8. Kostoff, R.N. (1999) Science and technology innovation. Technovation, 19. Also http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/kostoff/ index.html.
9. NRC (1998) Peer Review in Environmental Technology Development Programs Washington, DC. National Academy Press.
10. USNRC (1988) Peer Review for High-level Nuclear Waste Repositories: Generic Technical Position, NUREG-1297. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Washington DC.
11. Van den Beemt, F.C.H.D. and Le Pair, C. (1991) Grading the grain: consistent evaluation of research proposals. Research Evaluation, 1 1.
12. Van den Beemt, F.C.H.D. (1997) The right mix: review by peers as well as by highly qualified persons (non-peers). Australian Research Council Commissioned Report: Peer Review Process No. 54, pp. 153-164.