Telecommunications Regulation and New Services: A Case Study at the State Level

Journal of Regulatory Economics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 285-305

  Prieger, James E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035618751     PISSN: 0922680X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011119126828     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Acton, J. P., and I. Vogelsang. 1989. "Price-Cap Regulation: Introduction." RAND Journal of Economics 20(3), 369-372.
2. Ai, C., and D. E. M. Sappington. 1998. The Impact of State Incentive Regulation on the U.S. Telecommunications Industry. Mimeo.
3. Amemiya, T. 1985. Advanced Econometrics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Anscombe, F. J. 1950. "Sampling Theory of the Negative Binomial and Logarithmic Series Distributions." Biometrika 37(3/4), 358-382.
5. Averch, H., and L. L. Johnson. 1962. "Behavior of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint." American Economic Review 52(5), 1053-1069.
6. Bonanno, G., and B. Haworth. 1998. "Intensity of Competition and the Choice Between Product and Process Innovation." International Journal of Industrial Organization 16(4), 495-510.
7. Cabral, L. M. B., and M. H. Riordan. 1989. "Incentives for Cost Reduction Under Price Cap Regulation." Journal of Regulatory Economics 1(2), 93-102.
8. Cameron, A. C., and P. K. Trivedi. 1998. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Econometric Society Monographs, 30, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Greene, W. H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. 2nd edn, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
10. Greenstein, S., S. McMaster, and P. T. Spiller. 1995. "The Effect of Incentive Regulation on Infrastructure Modernization: Local Exchange Companies' Deployment of Digital Technology." Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4(2), 187-236.
11. Harris, R. G. 1997. "Testimony in Support of Opportunity Indiana II Submitted by Ameritech Indiana to the IURC, Cause No. 39705."
12. Hausman, J. 1997. "Valuing the Effect of Regulation on New Services in Telecommunications." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics, 1-38.
13. Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. 1990. Final Report, Cause No. 37905. September 19.
14. Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. 1997a. Annual Report, 1996-1997.
15. Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. 1997b. Telephone Report to the Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly. July 1.
16. Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. 1998. Telephone Report to the Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly. July 1.
17. Kraushaar, J. M. 1991-1997. "Fiber Deployment Update." Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission.
18. Littlechild, S. C. 1983. "Regulation of British Telecom's Profitability." Report to the Secretary of State, Department of Industry, London, February.
19. Mayo, J. W. and Joseph E. Flynn. 1988. "The Effects of Regulation on Research and Development: Theory and Evidence." Journal of Business 61(3), 321-336.
20. Mueller, M. L. 1993. Telephone Companies in Paradise: a Case Study in Telecommunications Deregulation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
21. Prieger, J. E. 1999. Regulation, Innovation, and the Introduction of New Telecommunications Services. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
22. Prieger, J. E. 2000. Telecommunications Regulation and New Services: A Case Study at the State Level. Working Paper 00-11, Department of Economics, University of California, Davis.
23. Quandt, R. E. 1983. "Computational Problems and Methods." In Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator, eds. Handbook of Econometrics. Volume I. Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier, pp. 699-764.
24. Ross, S. M. 1983. Stochastic Processes. (Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Probability and Mathematical Statistics.) New York: John Wiley & Sons.
25. Sappington, D. E. M., and Dennis L. Weisman. 1996. "Potential Pitfalls in Empirical Investigations of the Effects of Incentive Regulation Plans in the Telecommunications Industry." Information Economics and Policy 8, 125-140.
26. Taylor, W E., C. J. Zarkadas, and J. D. Zona. 1992. Incentive Regulation and the Diffusion of New Technology in Telecommunications. NERA mimeo.
27. United States. Federal Communications Commission. Common Carrier Bureau. 1987-1997. Statistics of Communications Common Carriers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. GPO.