Instructional Television versus Traditional Teaching of an Introductory Psychology Course

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 88-92

  Bacon, Steven F ^a   Jakovich, Julie A ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035616339     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: 15322802     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15328023TOP2802_02     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Andrews E.-A. Gosse V. F. Gaulton R. S. Maddigan R. I. (1999). Teaching introductory psychology at a distance by two-way interactive video. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 115–118.
2. Blumenstyk G. McCollum K. (1999, April 16). 2 reports question utility and accessibility in distance education. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45 (32), p. A31.
3. Clark R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459.
4. Cohen P. A. Ebeling B. J. Kulik J. A. (1981). A meta-analysis of outcome studies of visual-based instruction. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 26–36.
5. Davis D. J. (1984). Evaluation and comparison of teleconference training with face-to-face training and the effects on attitude and learning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46 (01), 130A.
6. Dubin R. Hedley R. A. (1969). The medium may be related to the message: College instruction by TV. Eugene: University of Oregon Press.
7. Jamison D. Suppes P. Wells S. (1974). The effectiveness of alternative instructional media: A survey. Review of Educational Research, 44, 1–67.
8. Kendall J. R. Oaks M. (1992). Evaluation of perceived teaching effectiveness: Course delivery via interactive video technology versus traditional classroom methods. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 10, 2–12.
9. Naisbitt J. (1984). Megatrends. New York: Warner.
10. Phipps R. Merisotis J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
11. Ritchie H. Newby T. J. (1989). Classroom lecture/discussion vs. live televised instruction: A comparison of effects on student performance, attitude, and interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3 (3), 36–45.
12. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1998). Statistical abstracts of the United States: 1998 (118th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13. Wetzel C. D. Radtke P. H. Stern H. W. (1994). Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Whittington N. (1987). Is instructional television educationally effective? A research review. American Journal of Distance Education, 1 (1), 47–57.
15. Zigerell J. (1991). The uses of television in American higher education. New York: Praeger.