Second-mover advantages in dynamic quality competition

Journal of Economics and Management Strategy

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 419-433

  Hoppe, Heidrun C ^a   Lehmann Grube, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035615462     PISSN: 10586407     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/105864001316908008     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aoki, R. and T.J. Prusa, 1997, "Sequential versus Simultaneous Choice with Endogenous Quality," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 103-121.
2. Berndt, E.R., L. Bui, D.R. Reily, and G.L. Urban, 1995, "Information, Marketing, and Pricing in the U.S. Antiulcer Drug Market," American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 85, 100-105.
3. Dutta, P.K., S. Lach, and A. Rustichini, 1995, "Better Late than Early: Vertical Differentiation in the Adoption of a New Technology," Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 4, 563-589.
4. Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole, 1985, "Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoption of New Technology," Review of Economic Studies, 52, 383-401.
5. _ and _, 1991, Game Theory, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
6. Hoppe, H.C., 2000a, "Second-Mover Advantages in the Strategic Adoption of New Technology under Uncertainty," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 315-338.
7. _, 2000b, "A Strategic Search Model of Technology Adoption and Policy," in M.R. Baye, ed., Advances in Applied Microeconomics, v. 9: Industrial Organization, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 197-214.
8. _ and U. Lehmann-Grube, 2001, "Second-Mover Advantages in Technological Competition," Working Paper, Universität Hamburg.
9. Karlin, S., 1959, Mathematical Methods and Theory of Games, Programming, and Economics, v. 2: The Theory of Infinite Games, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Lehmann-Grube, U., 1997, "Strategic Choice of Quality When Quality Is Costly - The Persistence of the High Quality Advantage," RAND Journal of Economics, 28, 372-384.
11. Lieberman, M.B. and D.B. Montgomery, 1988, "First-Mover Advantages," Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41-58.
12. _ and _, 1998, "First-mover (Dis)advantages: Retrospective and Link with the Resource-Based View," Strategic Management Journal, 19, 1111-1125.
13. Lilien, G.L. and E. Yoon, 1990, "The Timing of Competitive Market Entry: An Exploratory Study of New Industrial Products," Management Science, 36, 568-585.
14. Mueller, D.C., 1997, "First-Mover Advantages and Path Dependence," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 827-850.
15. Reinganum, J.F., 1981, "On the Diffusion of New Technology: A Game Theoretic Approach," Review of Economic Studies, 48, 395-405.
16. Ronnen, U., 1991, "Minimum Quality Standards, Fixed Costs, and Competition," RAND Journal of Economics, 22, 491-504.
17. Shankar, V., G.S. Carpenter, and L. Krishnamurthi, 1998, "Late Mover Advantage: How Innovative Late Entrants Outsell Pioneers," Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 54-70.
18. Shepherd, D.A., 1999, "Venture Capitalists' Assessment of New Venture Survival," Management Science, 45, 621-632.
19. Simon, L.K. and M.B. Stinchcombe, 1989, "Extensive Form Games in Continuous Time: Pure Strategies," Econometrica, 57, 1171-1214.
20. Stoneman, P. and P. Diederen, 1994, "Technology Diffusion and Public Policy," Economic Journal, 104, 918-930.
21. Tellis, G.J. and P.N. Golder, 1996, "First to Market, First to Fail? Real Causes of Enduring Market Leadership," Sloan Management Review, 37, 65-75.
22. Tirole, J., 1988, The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.