The impact of indian casinos on state lotteries: A case study of Arizona

Public Finance Review

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 139-147

  Siegel, Donald ^a   Anders, Gary ^b  

^a NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035613377     PISSN: 10911421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109114210102900203     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Anders, Gary, Donald Siegel, and Munther Yacoub. 1998. Does Indian casino gambling reduce state revenues? Evidence from Arizona. Contemporary Economic Policy 16 (3): 347-55.
2. Christiansen, Eugene M. 1998. Gambling and the American economy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 556 (March): 36-52.
3. Clotfelter, Charles T., and Philip J. Cook. 1989. Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Eadington, William. 1995. Economic development and the introduction of casinos: Myths and realities. Economic Development Review 13 (4): 51-54.
5. Kindt, John W. 1994. The economic impacts of legalized gambling activities. Drake Law Review 43 (1): 51-95.
6. Mikesell, John L. 1991. Lottery expenditure in a non-lottery state. Journal of Gambling Studies 7 (2): 89-98.
7. _. 1994. State lottery sales and economic activity. National Tax Journal 47 (1): 165-71.
8. Mobilla, Pamela. 1992. Trends in gambling: The pari-mutuel racing industry and effect of state lotteries: A new market definition. Journal of Cultural Economics 16 (2): 51-62.
9. Siegel, Donald, and Gary Anders. 1999. Public policy and the displacement effects of casinos: A case study of riverboat gambling in Missouri. Journal of Gambling Studies 15 (2): 105-21.
10. Steinnes, Donald. 1998. Have Indian casinos diminished other gambling in Minnesota? An economic assessment based on accessibility. Mimeo.
11. Szakmary, Andrew C., and Carol Matheny Szakmary. 1995. State lotteries as a source of revenue: A re-examination. Southern Economic Journal 61 (4): 1167-81.