Knowing When You've Brought Them in: Scientific Genre Knowledge and Communities of Practice

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 223-264

  O'Neill, D Kevin ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035611543     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1003_1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bartholomae, D. (1985). Inventing the University. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write: Studies in writer's block and other composing-process problems (pp. 134-165). New York: Guilford.
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Bell, P. (1997, December). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. Paper presented at the conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Toronto, Canada.
4. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1), 1-14.
6. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-272). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.
7. Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Cope, B., & Kalanzis, M. (1993). The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
9. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21-32.
10. Freedman, A. (1993). Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 222-251.
11. Hawkins, J., & Collins, A. (in press). Design experiments: Evaluating the role of technology in supporting school change. In J. C. Hawkins (Ed.), Design experiments: Using technology to restructure schools. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping teachers learn project-based instruction. Elementary School Journal, 94, 483-497.
13. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15. Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Reiser, B. J., Gomez, L. M., Edelson, D. C., & Russell, E. (1997, December). The Progress Portfolio: Promoting reflective inquiry in complex investigation environments. Paper presented at the conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Toronto, Canada.
16. Miller, C. R. (1994). Genre as social action. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 23-42). London: Taylor and Francis.
17. Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
18. O'Neill, D. K. (1998). Engaging science practice through science practitioners: Design experiments in K-12 telementoring. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.
19. O'Neill, D. K., & Gomez, L. M. (1994, June). The collaboratory notebook: A networked knowledge-building environment for project learning. Paper presented at Ed-Media '94: World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
20. O'Neill, D. K., & Gomez, L. M. (1998, November). Sustaining mentoring relationships on-line. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA.
21. O'Neill, D. K., & Gomez, L. M. (2000). Unfinished business: Human relationships in the design of CSCW systems. Unpublished manuscript.
22. O'Neill, D. K., & Harris, J. B. (2000). Is everybody happy? Bridging the perspectives and developmental needs of participants in telementoring initiatives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
23. O'Neill, D. K., & Scardamalia, M. (2000, June). Mentoring in the open: A strategy for supporting human development in the knowledge society. Paper presented at ICLS 2000: International Conference on the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.
24. O'Neill, D. K., Wagner, R., & Gomez, L. M. (1996, November). Online mentors: Experimenting in science class. Educational Leadership, 54, 39-42.
25. Pea, R. D. (1992). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 89-132). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Pea, R. D. (1993, May). Distributed multimedia learning environments: The collaborative visualization project. Communications of the ACM, 60-63.
27. Pea, R. D., & Gomez, L. M. (1992). Distributed multimedia learning environments: Why and how? [Tech. Rep. 25]. Chicago: Northwestern University, Institute for the Learning Sciences.
28. Perkins, D. N. (1993). Creating a culture of thinking. Educational Leadership, 51(3), 98-99.
29. Polman, J. L. (2000). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Ruopp, R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (Eds.). (1993). LabNet: Toward a community of practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Russell, D. (1991). Writing in the academic disciplines, 1870-1990: A curricular history. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
32. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
33. Suthers, D. (1998, April). Representations for scaffolding collaborative inquiry on ill-structured problems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
34. Sutton, C. (1989). Writing and reading in science: The hidden messages. In R. Millar (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education (pp. 137-159). London: Falmer.
35. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17, 299-326.