Invariance on the NEO PI-R Neuroticism scale

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 83-110

  Reise, Steven P ^a   Smith, Larissa ^b   Furr, R Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035607132     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_04     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bentler, P. M. & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS for windows user's guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
2. Camilli, G. (1992). A conceptual analysis of differential item functioning in terms of a multidimensional item response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 129-147.
3. Church, A. T. & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big Five and Tellegen's three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93-114.
4. Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Obessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
5. Dodd, B. G. & Koch, W. R. (1987). Effects of variations in item step values on item and test information in the partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 371-384.
6. Flowers, C. P., Oshima, T. C., & Raju, N. S. (1999). A description and demonstration of the polytomous-DFIT framework. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 309-326.
7. Jorm, A. (1987). Sex differences in neuroticism: A quantitative synthesis of published research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 21, 501-506.
8. Kim, S. & Cohen, A. S. (1998). Detection of differential item functioning under the graded response model with the likelihood ratio test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 345-355.
9. Kok, F. (1988). Item bias and test multidimensionality. In R. Langeheine & J. Rost (Eds.), Latent trait and latent class models. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
10. McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. B. (in press). Evaluating the replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory Factor Analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
11. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Merideth, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika. 58, 525-543.
13. Merideth, W. (1997). Factorial invariance revisited. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Scottsdale, Arizona.
14. Millsap, R. E. (1998). Group differences in regression intercepts: Implications for factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 403-424.
15. Millsap, R. E. & Everson, H. T. (1993). Methodology review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 297-334.
16. Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159-176.
17. Muraki, E. (1999). Stepwise analysis of differential item functioning based on multiple-group partial credit model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 217-232.
18. Muraki, E. & Bock, R. D. (1998). PARSCALE (version 3.5): Parameter scaling of rating data. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software, Inc.
19. Muraki, E. & Engelhard, G. (1989). Examining differential item functioning with BIMAIN. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
20. Muthén, B. & Lehman, J. (1985). Multiple group IRT modeling: Applications to item bias analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 10, 133-142.
21. Muthén, B. & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applies researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
22. Oshima, T. C. & Miller, M. D. (1992). Multidimensionality and item bias in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 237-248.
23. Park, D. G. & Lautenschlager, G. J. (1990). Improving IRT item bias detection with iterative linking and ability scale purification. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 23-37.
24. Potenza, M. T. & Dorans, N. J. (1995). DIF assessment for polytomous items: A framework for classification and evaluation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 23-27.
25. Raju, N. S., van der Linden, W. J., & Fleer, P. F. (1995). IRT-based internal measure of differential functioning of items and tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 353-368.
26. Reise, S. P. & Henson, M. J. (2001). Fitting Polytomous IRTmodels to the NEO PI-R facet scales. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27. Reynolds, C. R. (1995). Test bias and the assessment of intelligence and personality. In D. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 545-576). New York: Plenum.
28. Reynolds, C. R. (1998). Need we measure anxiety differently for males and females? Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 212-221.
29. Smith, L. L. & Reise, S. P. (1999). Gender differences on negative affectivity: An IRT study of differential item functioning on the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire Stress Reaction Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1350-1362.
30. Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structures between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229-239.
31. Sörbom, D. (1982). Structural equation models with structured means. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction. (p. 183-195). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
32. Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. University of Minnesota.
33. Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1993). Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34. Waller, N. G. (1995). MicroFact (1.0): A microcomputer factor analysis program for ordered polytomous data and mainframe sized problems. St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems Corp.
35. Watson, D. & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465-490.
36. Widaman, K. F. & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In Bryant, K. J., Windle, M., & West, S. G. (Eds.) The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37. Zimowski, M. F., Muraki, E., Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1996). BiLOG-MG: Multiple-Group IRT Analysis and Test Maintenance for Binary Items. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
38. Zwick, R. & Thayer, D. T. (1996). Evaluating the magnitude of differential item functioning in polytomous items. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 187-201.