Econometric implications of rectangular hyperbolic crop-weed competition

Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 247-257

  Moffitt, L Joe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035605114     PISSN: 00083976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2001.tb00301.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bell, C. E. 1995. Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) yield loss from Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne) interference. Weed Science 43 (1): 117-20.
2. Cardina, J., E. Regnier and D. Sparrow. 1995. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition and economic thresholds in conventional- and no-tillage com (Zea mays). Weed Science 43 (1): 81-87.
3. Carrasco-Tauber, C. and L. J. Moffitt. 1992. Damage control econometrics: functional specification and pesticide productivity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74: 158-62.
4. Consens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Annals of Applied Biology 107 (2): 239-252.
5. Cramér, H. 1946. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Fernandez-Cornejo, J. and S. Jans. 1999. Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture. Agricultural Handbook Number 717. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C.
7. Fox, G. and A. Weersink. 1995. Damage control and increasing returns. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77 (1): 33-39.
8. Just, R. E. 2000. Some guiding principles for empirical production research in agriculture. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29 (2): 138-158.
9. Kwon, T. J., D. L. Young, F. L. Young and C. M. Boerboom. 1995. PALWEED: WHEAT: A bioeconomic decision model for postemergence weed management in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Science 43 (4): 595-603.
10. Lange, K. 1999. Numerical Analysis for Statisticians. New York: Springer.
11. Lichtenberg, E. and D. Zilberman. 1986. The econometrics of damage control: why specification matters. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68: 261-73.
12. Limon-Ortega, A., S. C. Mason and A. R. Martin. 1998. Production practices improve grain sorghum and pearly millet competitiveness with weeds. Agronomy Journal 90 (2): 227-32.
13. Liu, W., L. J. Moffitt, L. K. Lee and P. C. Bhowmik. 1999. Publicly provided information in environmental management: incorporating groundwater quality goals into herbicide treatment recommendations. Journal of Environmental Management 55: 239-48.
14. Marsh, T. L., R. G. Huffaker and G. E. Long. 2000. Optimal control of vector-virus-plant interactions: the case of potato leafroll virus net necrosis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 556-69.
15. Pannell, D. J. 1991. An economic response model of herbicide application for weed control. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 34 (3): 223-41.
16. Rothenberg, T. J. 1971. Identification in parametric models. Econometrica 39 (3): 577-91.
17. Saphores, J-D. M. 2000. The economic threshold with a stochastic pest population: a real options approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 541-55.
18. Sunding, D. and J. Zivin. 2000. Insect population dynamics, pesticide use, and farmworker health. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 527-40.
19. Swinton, S. M., D. D. Buhler, F. Forcella, J. L. Gunsolus and R. P. King. 1994. Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Science 42 (1): 103-09.
20. Weatherspoon, D. M. and E. E. Schweizer. 1971. Competition between sugarbeets and five densities of kochia. Weed Science 19 (2): 125-28.
21. Wilson, R. G. 1993. Wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) interference in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Science 41 (4): 607-10.