Changing the debate about "success" in conflict resolution efforts

Negotiation Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 101-113

  D'Estrée, Tamra Pearson ^a   Fast, Larissa A ^a   Weiss, Joshua N ^a   Jakobsen, Monica S ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035604294     PISSN: 07484526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2001.tb00230.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abu-Nimer, M. 1998. Conflict resolution training in the Middle East: Lessons to be learned. International Negotiation 3: 99-116.
2. _. 1999. Dialogue, conflict resolution and change: Arab-Jewish encounters in Israel. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3. Babbitt, E. F. 1997. Contributions of training to international conflict resolution. In Peacemaking in international conflict: Methods and techniques, edited by I. W. Zartman and J. L. Rasmussen. Washington: U. S. Institute of Peace Press.
4. Ben Dor, G. 1999. Some paradoxes and lessons of the Oslo negotiating process. In Negotiation eclectics: Essays in memory of Jeffrey Z. Rubin, edited by D. M. Kolb. Cambridge, Mass.: PON Books (The Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School).
5. Burton, J. and F. Dukes. 1990. Conflict: Practices in management, settlement and resolution. New York: St. Martin's Press.
6. Burton, J. W. 1990. Conflict resolution as a political system. In The psychodynamics of international relationships: Unofficial diplomacy at work, edited by V. D. Volkan, J. V. Montville and D. A. Julius. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
7. Bush, R. A. B. and J. P. Folger. 1994. The promise of mediation: Responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Chigas, D. V. 1997. Unofficial interventions with official actors: Parallel negotiation training in violent intrastate conflicts. International Negotiation 2 (3): 409-436.
9. Colby, B. G. and T. P. d'Estrée. 1997. Evaluating the relative effectiveness of conflict resolution processes: Applications to southwestern water conflicts. Tucson: Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona.
10. d'Estrée, T. P. and B. G. Colby. 2000a. Guidebook for analyzing success in environmental conflict resolution. ICAR report #3. Fairfax, Va.: Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University.
11. _. and _. 2000b. Evaluating success in environmental conflict resolution: Case studies of Western water conflicts. Unpublished manuscript.
12. d'Estrée, T. P., and M. S. Jakobsen. 2000. Establishing a common framework for comparative case analysis of interactive conflict resolution. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, 18-21 June 2000, St. Louis, Mo.
13. d'Estrée, T. P., J. N. Weiss, M. S. Jakobsen, L. Fast, and N. Funk. 2000. A framework for evaluating intergroup interactive conflict resolution. Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
14. Diamond, L. and R. J. Fisher. 1995. Integrating conflict resolution training and consultation: A Cyprus example. Negotiation Journal 11: 287-301.
15. Diamond, L., and J. McDonald. 1996. Multi-track diplomacy: A systems approach to peace. 3rd ed. West Hartford, Conn.: Kumarian Press.
16. Druckman, D. and P. Stern. 1997. The forum: Evaluating peacekeeping missions. Mershon International Studies Review 41: 151-165.
17. Fisher, R. J. 1993. The potential for peacebuilding: Forging a bridge from peacekeeping to peacemaking. Peace and Change 18 (2): 247-266.
18. _. 1997. Interactive conflict resolution. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
19. _. 1997. Training as interactive conflict resolution: Characteristics and challenges. International Negotiation 2 (3): 331-351.
20. Fisher, R. J. and L. Keashly. 1991. The potential complementarity of mediation and consultation within a contingency model of third party intervention. Journal of Peace Research 28 (1): 29-42.
21. Haas, P. 1994. Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. In International organization: A reader, edited by F. Kratochwill and J. G. Ruggie. New York: Harper Collins.
22. Heller, M. 1994. The Israeli-Palestinian accord: An Israeli view. Current History. 56-61.
23. Hubbard, A. S. 1999. Cultural and status differences in intergroup conflict resolution: A longitudinal study of a Middle East dialogue group in the United States. Human Relations 52 (3): 303.
24. Kelman, H. C. 1995. Contributions of an unofficial conflict resolution effort to the Israeli-Palestinian breakthrough. Negotiation Journal 11(1): 19-28.
25. Kriesberg, L. 1998. Constructive conflicts: From escalation to resolution. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlield.
26. Kuttab, J. 1998. The pitfalls of dialogue. Conflict Resolution Notes 15 (3): 25-26.
27. Lederach, J. P. 1997. Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington: U. S. Institute of Peace Press.
28. Montville, J. 1993. The healing function in political conflict resolution. In Conflict resolution theory and practice: Integration and application, edited by D. J. D. Sandole and H. van der Merwe. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
29. Patton, M. Q. 1997. Utilization focused evaluation: The new century text. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
30. Peterson, L., E. K. Wayne, and M. S. Jakobsen. 2001. Evaluating racial dialogue: Applying the d'Estrée evaluation framework to dialogues between African-American and Jewish youth in Washington, D.C. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, 15-18 July 2001, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
31. Pruitt, D. 1999. Secrecy, ripeness, and working trust at Oslo. In Negotiation eclectics: Essays in memory of Jeffrey Z. Rubin, edited by D. M. Kolb. Cambridge, Mass.: PON Books (The Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School).
32. Ross, M.H. 2000. Creating the conditions for peacemaking: Theories of practice in ethnic conflict resolution. Ethnic and Racial Studies 23: 1002-1034.
33. Rothman, J. 1997. Action evaluation and conflict resolution training: Theory, method and case study. International Negotiation 2(3): 451-470.
34. Rouhana, N. N. 1995. Unofficial third-party intervention in international conflict: Between legitimacy and disarray. Negotiation Journal 11: 225-270.
35. Sander, F. E. A., and S. B. Goldberg. 1994. Fitting the forum to the fuss: A user-friendly guide to selecting an ADR procedure. Negotiation Journal 10 (1): 49-68.
36. Saunders, H. H. 1995. Possibilities and challenges: Another way to consider unofficial third-party intervention. Negotiation Journal 11: 271-275.
37. _. 1999. A public peace process: Sustained dialogue to transform racial and ethnic conflicts. New York: St. Martin's Press.
38. Schwarz, R. D. 1989. Arab-Jewish dialogue in the United States: Toward Track II tractability. In Intractable conflicts and their transformation, edited by L. Kriesberg, T. A. Northrup and S. J. Thorson. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
39. Shah, I. 1964. The Sufis. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
40. Sharoni, S. 1995. Gender and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
41. Sørbø, G., J. Macrae, and L. Wohlgemuth. 1997. NGOs in conflict - An evaluation of International Alert. Bergen, Norway: Chr. Michelsen Institute Report Series, 6.
42. Stern, P. C. and D. Druckman. 2000. Evaluating interventions in history: The case of international conflict resolution. International Studies Review 2 (1): 33-64.
43. Volkan, V. 1991. On "chosen trauma." Mind and Human Interaction 3: 13.
44. Volkan, V. and E. Zintl. 1993. Life after loss: Lessons of grief. New York: Charles Schribner's Sons.
45. Webb, E., D.J. Campbell, and R. P. Schwartz, eds. 1999. Unobtrusive measures (rev. ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
46. Zartman, I. W. 1999. Ripeness, process, and re-entry at Oslo. In Negotiation eclectics: Essays in memory of Jeffrey Z. Rubin, edited by D. M. Kolb. Cambridge, Mass.: PON Books (The Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School).