Additional information for: ”Comments on ”Alternative models of demand for automobiles” by Charlotte Wojcik”

Economics Letters

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 43-51

  Berry, Steve ^a   Pakes, Ariel ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

BLP; C5 Econometric modeling; L0 Industrial organization (general); Logit; Nested logit

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035602675     PISSN: 01651765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00533-X     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Berry S. Estimating discrete choice models of product differentiation. RAND Journal of Economics. 23:(2):1994;242-262.
2. Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile press in market equilibrium. Econometrica. 60:(4):1995;889-917.
3. Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., Pakes, A., 1998. Differentiated products demand systems form a combination of micro and macro data: the new car market, Working Paper 6481, NBER #6481.
4. Berry, S.T., Pakes, A., 2000. Estimating the Pure Characteristics Discrete Choice Model. Yale University, Discussion paper.
5. Bresnahan T., Stern S., Trajtenberg M. Market segmentation and the sources of rents from innovation: personal computers in the late 1980s. RAND Journal of Economics, Special Issue. 28:(0):1997;S17-44.
6. Caplin A., Nalebuff B. Aggregation and imperfect competition: on the existence of equilibrium. Econometrica. 59:(1):1991;1-23.
7. Cardell N.S. Variance components structures for the extreme-value and logistic distributions with applications to models of heterogeneity. Econometric-Theory. 13:(2):1997;185-213.
8. Goldberg P.K. Product differentiation and oligopoly in international markets: the case of the U.S. automobile industry. Econometrica. 63:(4):1995;891-951.
9. Hausman J., Wise D. A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences. Econometrica. 46:1978;403-426.
10. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P. Frontiers of Econometrics. 1974;Academic Press, New York.
11. McFadden D. Method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica. 57:(5):1989;995-1026.
12. McFadden D., Talvitie A., et al. Demand Model Estimation and Validation. 1977;Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley, CA.
13. Nevo A. Mergers with differentiated products: the case of the ready-to-eat cereal industry. RAND Journal of Economics. 31:(3):2000;395-421.
14. Nevo A. Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica. 69:(2):2001;307-342.
15. Pakes A. Patents as options: some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica. 54:1986;755-784.
16. Pakes A., Berry S., Levinsohn J. Some applications and limitations of recent advances in empirical industrial organization: price indexes and the analysis of environmental change. American Economic Review, Paper and Proceedings. 83:1993;240-246.
17. Pakes A., Pollard D. Simulation and the asymptotics of optimization estimators. Econometrica. 54:1989;1027-1057.
18. Petrin, A., 2000. Quantifying the Benefits of New Products: The Case of the Minivan. University of Chicago GSB, Discussion paper.
19. Wojcik C. Alternative models of demand for automobiles. Economics Letters. 68:2000;113-118.