Adoption of a process innovation with learning-by-doing: Evidence from the semiconductor industry

Journal of Industrial Economics

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 269-280

  Cabral, Ricardo ^a   Leiblein, Michael J ^b  

^a SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035600932     PISSN: 00221821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6451.00149     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allison, P., 1982, 'Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories', in Leinhardt, S. (editor), Sociological Methodology, (Jossey-Bass), pp. 61-97.
2. Angel, D. P., 1994, Restructuring for Innovation: The Remaking of the U.S. Semiconductor Industry (Guilford Press, New York).
3. Baptista, R., 2000, 'Do Innovations Diffuse Faster within Geographical Clusters?', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, pp. 515-535.
4. Chari, V. V. and Hopenhayn, H., 1991, 'Vintage Human Capital, Growth, and the Diffusion of New Technology', Journal of Political Economy, 99, No. 6, pp. 1142-1165.
5. Dick, A. R., 1991, 'Learning by Doing and Dumping in the Semiconductor Industry', Journal of Law and Economics, 34, pp. 133-159.
6. Dunne, T., 1994, 'Plant Age and Technology Use in U.S. Manufacturing Industries', RAND Journal of Economics, v. 25(3), pp. 488-499.
7. Flamm, K., 1993, 'Semiconductor Dependency and Strategic Trade Policy', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, No. 1, pp. 249-333.
8. Gruber, H., 1994, Learning and Strategic Product Innovation: Theory and Evidence for the Semiconductor Industry (North-Holland).
9. Hannan, T. and McDowell, J., 1984, 'The Determinants of Technology Adoption: The Case of the Banking Firm', RAND Journal of Economics, 15, pp. 328-335.
10. Hannan, T. and McDowell, J., 1987, 'Rival Precedence and the Dynamics of Technology Adoption: an Empirical Analysis', Economica, 55, pp. 155-177.
11. Hazewindus, N., with J. Tooker, 1982, The U.S. Microelectronics Industry: Technical Change, Industry Growth and Social Impact (New York: Pergamon Press).
12. Irwin, D. A. and Klenow, P. J., 1994, 'Learning-by-Doing Spillovers in the Semiconductor Industry', Journal of Political Economy, 102, pp. 1200-1227.
13. Jovanovic, B. and Lach, S., 1989, 'Entry, Exit, and Diffusion with Learning by Doing', American Economic Review, 79, No. 4, pp. 690-699.
14. Jovanovic, B. and MacDonald, G., 1994, 'Competitive Diffusion', Journal of Political Economy, 102, No. 1, pp. 24-52.
15. Karshenas, M. and Stoneman, P., 1993, 'Rank, Stock, Order, and Epidemic Effects in the Diffusion of New Process Technologies: An Empirical Model', RAND Journal of Economics, 24, pp. 503-528.
16. Kiefer, N., 1988, 'Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions', Journal of Economic Literature, 26, pp. 646-679.
17. Levin, Sharon, Levin, Stanford and Meisel, J., 1987, 'A Dynamic Analysis of the Adoption of a New Technology: The Case of Optical Scanners', Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, pp. 12-17.
18. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1985, The Semiconductor Industry: Trade Related Issues (OECD, Paris).
19. Parente, S. L., 1994, 'Technology Adoption, Learning-by-Doing, and Economic Growth', Journal of Economic Theory, 36:2, 346-369.
20. Polanyi, M., 1967, The Tacit Dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
21. Porter, M., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Macmillan, London).
22. Prentice, R. L. and Gloeckler, L. A., 1978, 'Regression Analysis of Grouped Survival Data with Application to Breast Cancer Data', Biometrics, v. 34, pp. 57-67.
23. Rose, N. and Joskow, P., 1990, 'The Diffusion of New Technologies: Evidence from the Electric Utility Industry', RAND Journal of Economics, v. 21, No. 3, pp. 354-373.