Quantifying the sources of value of a public service

Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 225-239

  Finn, Adam ^a   McFadyen, Stuart ^b   Hoskins, Colin ^b   Hupfer, Maureen ^c  

^a Department of Business ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035600610     PISSN: 07439156     EISSN: 15477207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1509/jppm.20.2.225.17365     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adamowitz, Wiktor L., Vinay Bhardwaj, and Bruce Macnab (1993), "Experiment on the Difference Between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept," Land Economics, 69 (November), 416-27.
2. -, Peter Boxall, Michael Williams, and Jordan Louviere (1998), "Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80 (February), 64-75.
3. Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. Portney, E. Learner, R. Radner, and H. Schuman (1993), "Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation," Federal Register, 58, 4601-14.
4. Blarney, Russell, Jenny Gordon, and Ross Chapman (1999), "Choice Modelling: Assessing the Environmental Values of Water Supply Options," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 43 (3), 337-57.
5. Carroll, J. Douglas and Paul E. Green (1995), "Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part 1, Conjoint Analysis," Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (November), 385-91.
6. Carson, Richard T. (1997), "Contingent Valuation: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests Since the NOAA Panel," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79 (5), 1501-1507.
7. Cummings, R.G., D.S. Brookshire, and W.D. Schulze, eds. (1986), Valuing Environmental Goods: A State of the Arts Assessment of the Contingent Method. Totawa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
8. Diamond, Peter A. and Jerry A. Hausman (1994), "Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number?" Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (4), 45-64.
9. Dillman, Don A. (1993), letter to Alan Carlin, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, United States Environmental Protection Agency (March 31); reproduced in William Schultze, Gary McClelland, Donald Waldman, and Jeff Lazo (1996), "Sources of Bias in Contingent Valuation," in The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources, David J. Bjornstad and James R. Kahn, eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 97-116.
10. Hanemann, W. Michael (1984), "Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66 (August), 332-41.
11. _ (1991), "Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?" American Economic Review, 81 (June), 635-47.
12. _ (1994), "Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (4), 19-43.
13. _ and Barbara Kanninen (1999), "The Statistical Analysis of Discrete Response CV Data," in Valuing Environmental Preferences, Ian J. Bateman and Kenneth G. Willis, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 302-441.
14. Hanley, Nick, Douglas MacMillan, Robert E. Wright, Craig Bulock, Ian Simpson, Dave Parsisson, and Bob Crabtree (1998), "Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland," Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49 (January), 1-15.
15. Harrison, Glenn W. and James C. Lesley (1996), "Must Contingent Valuation Surveys Cost So Much?" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31 (July), 79-95.
16. Hensher, D.A. and L.W. Johnson (1981), Applied Discrete-Choice Modeling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. _, Jordan Louviere, and Joffre Swait (1999), "Combining Sources of Reference Data," Journal of Econometrics, 89 (March/April), 197-221.
18. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979), "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," Econometrica, 47 (March), 263-91.
19. Loomis, John (1987), "Expanding Contingent Valuation Value Sample Estimates to Aggregate Benefit Estimates: Current Practices and Proposed Solutions," Land Economics, 63 (November), 396-402.
20. Louviere, Jordan (1988), Analyzing Decision Making, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-67. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
21. _ (1994), "Conjoint Analysis," in Advanced Methods of Marketing Research, Richard P. Bagozzi, ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 223-59.
22. _ (1996), "Relating Stated Preference Measures and Models to Choices in Real Markets: Calibration of CV Responses," in The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources, David J. Bjornstad and James R. Kahn, eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 167-88.
23. _, David A. Hensher, and Joffre D. Swait (2000), Stated Choice Methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Mitchell, Robert C. and Richard T. Carson (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Passell, P. (1993), "Polls May Help Government Decide the Worth of Nature," The New York Times, (September 6), 1, 20.
26. Portney, Paul R. (1994), "The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (4), 3-17.
27. Randall, Alan (1997), "The NOAA Panel Report: A New Beginning or the End of an Era?" American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79 (5), 1489-94.
28. _ and John R. Stoll (1980), "Consumer's Surplus in Commodity Space," American Economic Review, 70 (June), 449-55.
29. Salant, Priscilla and Don A. Dillman (1994), How to Conduct Your Own Survey. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
30. Samuelson, Paul A. (1954), "The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure," The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36 (November), 387-89.
31. Wedel, Michel, et al. (1999), "Discrete and Continuous Representations of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Choice Modeling," Marketing Letters, 10 (3), 219-32.
32. Wiseman, Frederick and Maryann Billington (1984), "Comments on a Standard Definition of Response Rate," Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (August), 336-38.