The Researched Opinions on Research: Visually impaired people and visual impairment research

Disability and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 815-835

  Duckett, Paul S ^a   Pratt, Rebekah ^b  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035600419     PISSN: 09687599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09687590120083976     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ALBEE, G.W (1988) The politics of nature and nurture, American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, pp. 4-36.
2. ALBEE, G.W (1996) The psychological origins of the white male patriarchy, Journal of Primary Prevention, 17, pp. 75-79.
3. ALBEE, G.W & PERRY, M. (1998) Economic and social causes of sexism and of the exploitation of women, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8, pp. 145-160.
4. BALDWIN, S. (2000) Living in Britalin: why are so many amphetamines prescribed to infants, children and teenagers in the UK? Critical Public Health, 10, pp. 453-162.
5. BARNES, C. (1992) Qualitative research: valuable or irrelevant? Disability, Handicap and Society, 7, pp. 115-123.
6. BARNES, C. (1996) Disability and the myth of the independent researcher, Disability & Society, 11, pp. 107-110.
7. BARNES, C. & MERCER, G. (Eds) (1997) Doing Disability Research (Leeds, Disability Press).
8. BERESFORD, P. & CAMPBELL, J. (1994) Disabled people, service users, user involvement and representation, Disability & Society, 9, pp. 315-325.
9. BERKOWCITZ, B. (2000) Community and neighbourhood organisations, in: J. RAPPAPORT & E. SEIDMAN (Eds) Handbook of Community Psychology (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers).
10. COWEN, E.G. (1977) Baby steps toward primary prevention, American Journal of Community Psychology, 5, pp. 1-22.
11. COYNE, I.T. (1997) Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, pp. 623-630.
12. DAVIS, J.M. (2000) Disability studies as ethnographic research and text: research strategies and roles for promoting social change, Disability & Society, 15, pp. 191-206.
13. DENZIN, N.K. (1970) The Research Act in Sociology (London, Butterworth).
14. DUCKETT, P.S. (1998) Disabled at Interview: a community psychologist in and amid action (Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Stirling).
15. DUCKETT, P.S. & FRYER, D. (1998) Developing empowering research practices with people who have learning disabilities. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8, pp. 57-65.
16. DUCKETT, P.S. & PRATT, R.J. (1999) The Views of Visually Impaired People on Visual Impairment Research, report presented to the Gift of Thomas Pocklington, Winchester, UK.
17. DUCKETT, P.S. MCCALL, F. & FRYER, D. (2000) Qualitative Methodologies and Interactional Asymmetries: some attempts to reduce imbalance between interviewers and interviewees, paper presented to the 5th International Conference on Social Science Methodology (Cologne, International Sociological Association).
18. ENGELBERG, S. (1981) Toward explicit value standards in community psychology, American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, pp. 425-434.
19. HAHN, H. (1993) The potential impact of disability studies on political science (as well as vice-versa), Policy Studies Journal, 21, pp. 740-751.
20. HAMMERSLEY, M. & ATKINSON, P. (1983) Ethnography: principles in practice (London, Tavistock).
21. HUNT, P. (1981) Settling accounts with the parasite people: a critique of a life apart by E.J. Miller and G.V. Gwynne, Disability Challenge, 1, May, pp. 1-5.
22. JONES, S. (1985) The analysis of depth interviews, in R. WALKER (Ed.) Applied Qualitative Research (Aldershot, Gower).
23. KELLY, J.G. (1986) Context and process: an ecological view of the interdependence of practice and research, American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, pp. 581-589.
24. KITCHEN, R. (2000) The researched opinions on research: disabled people and disability research, Disability & Society, 15, pp. 25-47.
25. LEVANT, R.F. & SHLIEN, J.M. (Ed) (1984) Client-centered Therapy and the Person-centred Approach: new directions in theory, research and practice (London, Praeger).
26. LLOYD, G. & NORRIS, C. (1999) Including ADHD? Disability & Society, 14, pp. 505-517.
27. LUKES, S. (1973) Individualism (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).
28. MARCH, J., STEINGOLD, B., JUSTICE, S. & MITCHELL, P. (1997) Follow the yellow brick road! People with learning difficulties as co-researchers, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, pp. 77-80.
29. MATON, K.I. (2000) Making a difference: the social ecology of social transformation, American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, pp. 25-57.
30. MCCONKEY, R. (1998) Matching services to client needs: a research agenda for the new century, Journal of Learning Disabilities for Nursing, Health and Social Care, 2, pp. 57-59.
31. MILLER, S. (1997) Theory, experiment and practical application in research on visual impairment, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12, pp. 415-430.
32. MINKES, J., TOWNSLEY, R., WESTON, C. & WILLIAMS, C. (1995) Having a voice: involving people with learning difficulties in research, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, pp. 94-97.
33. MOORE, M., BEAZLEY, S. & MAELZER, J. (1998) Researching Disability Issues (Buckingham, Open University Press).
34. MORTON, K. & DUCKETT, P.S. (2000) The Opinions of Older Visually Impaired People on Issues Needing Research. Report presented to the Gift of Thomas Pocklington, Winchester, UK.
35. OLIVER,M. (1992) Changing the social relations of research production, Disability, Handicap & Society, 7, pp. 101-14.
36. PRATT, R. & WILKINSON, H. (2001) No Diagnosis Has to be Your Whole Life: the effect of being told the diagnosis of dementia from the perspective of the person with dementia. Report submitted to the Mental Health Foundation, London.
37. RAPPAPORT, J. (1981) In praise of paradox: a social policy of empowerment over prevention, American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, pp. 1-25.
38. REIFF, R. (1975) Of cabbages and kings, American Journal of Community Psychology, 3, pp. 187-196.
39. RNIB (1991) Blind and Partially Sighted Adults in Britain (London, RNIB).
40. RYAN, W. (1971) Blaming the Victim (New York, Random House).
41. SARASON, S. (1976) Community psychology, networks, and Mr Everyman, American Psychologist, 31, pp. 317-328.
42. TRICKETT, E.J. (1984) Toward a distinctive community psychology: an ecological metaphor for the conduct of community research and the nature of training, American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, pp. 261-280.
43. UNION OF THE PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED AGAINST SEGREGATION (1976) Fundamental Principles of Disability (London, UPIAS).
44. YOUNG, D.A. & QUIBELL, R. (2000) Why rights are never enough: rights, intellectual disability and understanding, Disability & Society, 15, pp. 747-764.
45. ZARB, G. (1992) On the road to Damascus: first steps towards changing the relations of research production, Disability, Handicap & Society, 7, pp. 125-138.