When people explain difficult actions, is the causal question how or why?

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 339-357

  McClure, John ^a   Hilton, Denis J ^b   Cowan, Jodie ^a   Ishida, Lucyna ^b   Wilson, Marc ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035596546     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X01020003004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
2. Försterling, F. (1989). Models of covariation and attribution: How do they relate to the analogy of analysis of variance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 615-625.
3. Graesser, A. C., Längston, M. C., & Baggett, W. B. (1993). Exploring information about concepts by asking questions. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 29, 411-436.
4. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
5. Graesser, A. C., Robertson, S. P., & Anderson, P. A. (1981). Incorporating inferences in narrative representations: A study of how and why. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 1-26.
6. Graesser, A. C., Robertson, S. P., Lovelace, E. R., & Swinehart, D. M. (1980). Answers to why-questions expose the organization of story plot and predict recall of actions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 110-119.
7. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
8. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
9. Hilton, D. J. (1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 65-81.
10. Hilton, D. J., & Knott, I. C. (1998). Explanatory relevance: Pragmatic constraints on the selection of causes from conditions. Unpublished manuscript.
11. Hilton, D. J., & Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge-based causal attributions: The abnormal conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 93, 75-88.
12. Kashima, Y., McKintyre, A., & Clifford, P. (1998). The category of the mind: Folk psychology of belief, desire, and intention. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 289-314.
13. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-238).
14. Leddo, J., Abelson, R. P., & Gross, P. H. (1984). Conjunctive explanations: When two reasons are better than one.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 933-943.
15. Malle, B. F., Knobe, J., O'Laughlin, M., Pearce, G. E., & Nelson, S. E. (2000). The study of free-response behavior explanations: Theory and method. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 309-326.
16. McClure, J., Densley, L., Liu, J. H., & Allen, M. (2001). Constraints on equifinality: Goals are good explanations only for controllable outcomes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 99-115.
17. McClure, J. L. (1998). Discounting causes of behavior: Are two reasons better than one? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 7-20.
18. McClure, J. L. (in press). Goal-based explanations of actions and outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology.
19. McClure, J. L., & Hilton, D. J. (1997). For you can't always get what you want: When preconditions are better explanations than goals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 223-240.
20. McClure, J. L., & Hilton, D. J. (1998). Are goals or preconditions better explanations? It depends on the question. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 897-911.
21. McClure, J. L., Lalljee, M., Jaspars, J., & Abelson, R. P. (1989). Conjunctive explanations of success and failure: The effect of different types of causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 19-26.
22. McGill, A. L. (1990). Conjunctive explanations: The effect of comparison of the target episode to a contrasting background instance. Social Cognition, 8, 362-382.
23. Read, S. J. (1988). Conjunctive explanations: The effect of a comparison between a chosen and nonchosen alternative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,24, 146-162.
24. Rips, L. J. (1998). Reasoning and conversation. Psychological Review, 105, 411-441.
25. Schwartz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93-105.
26. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
27. Sutton, R., & McClure, J. L. (2001). Covariational influences on goal-based explanation: An integrative model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 222-236.
28. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
29. Turnbull, W. (1986). Everyday explanation: The pragmatics of puzzle resolution. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 16, 141-160.
30. White, P. A. (1992). Causal powers, causal questions, and the place of regularity information in causal attribution. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 161-188.