Conflict management and organizational attitudes among Japanese: Individual and group goals and justice

Asian Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 93-101

  Ohbuchi, Ken Ichi ^a   Suzuki, Mariko ^a   Hayashi, Yoichiro ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035596215     PISSN: 13672223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2001.00078.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropnazano (Ed.), Justice in the work place: approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Hayashi, Y. & Ohbuchi, K. (1999). Jugyoin no sosiki ni taisuru koseichikakuto sosiki siko: keizaiteki model to shudan kachi model (Employees' perception of fairness on organization and their group-oriented attitudes: economic vs. group-value models). Japanese Association of Industrial/ Organizational Psychology Journal, 12, 99-110.
3. Huo, Y. J., Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1996). Superordinate identification, and justice goals: is separatism the problem; is assimiliation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
4. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
5. Kymlicka, W. (1992). Mainstream theories of justice. Brookfield, VT: Elgar.
6. Lind, E.A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
7. Markus, H. R., and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
8. Ohbuchi, K. (1998). Tetsuzukiteki kosei wo koete: shakai shudan no rironn he (Beyond procedural justice: toward a theory of social group). In K. Tanaka (Ed.), Kosei to koheino shinrigaku (The psychology of social justice and fairness) (pp. 83-103). Kyoto: Nakanishiya Shuppan.
9. Ohbuchi, K., & Imazai, K. (1999). Kokumin niyoru kuni ni taisuru kouseikan to commitment oyobi sono kino hyouka (People's functional evaluations, perception of justice, and commitment to the state). Japanese Journal of Psychology, 70, 310-318.
10. Ohbuchi, K., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1997). Multiple goals and tactical behaviors in social conflicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 2177-2199.
11. Ohbuchi, K., Tyler, T., Tanaka, K., & Sugawara, I. (1999). Nihonzin no sosiki nai katto: bunka hikaku no tameno yobiteki bunseki (Organizational conflict resolution: preliminary analysis for cross-cultural comparisons). In K. Ohbuchi (Ed.), Funso kaiketsu ni kansuru nitibei kan no hikaku kenkyu (Cross-cultural study of conflict management between Japan and the U.S.) (pp. 1-18). Grant in Aid for International Scientific Research Report.
12. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
14. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
15. Uchino, T., & Abegrain, J.C. (1988). Tenki ni tatsu nihongata keiei (A crisis in Japanese management). Tokyo: Chuo Keizaisha.
16. Van de Vliert, E., & Euwena, M.C. (1994). Agreeableness and activeness as components of conflict behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 674-687.