Response-Card Instruction and Student Learning in a College Classroom

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 101-104

  Kellum, Karen Kate ^a   Carr, James E ^a   Dozier, Claudia L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035594172     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: 15322802     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15328023TOP2802_06     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Austin J. L. (2000). Behavioral approaches to college teaching. In Austin J. Carr J. E. (eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 449–472). Reno, NV: Context.
2. Barbetta P. M. Heward W. L. (1993). Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of geography facts by elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 217–233.
3. Barlow D. H. Hersen M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Beishline M. J. Holmes C. B. (1997). Student preferences for various teaching styles. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24, 95–99.
5. Cavanaugh R. A. Heward W. L. Donelson F. (1996). Effects of response cards during lesson closure on the academic performance of secondary students in an earth science course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 403–406.
6. Dewey J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
7. Drevno G. E. Kimball J. W. Possi M. K. Heward W. L. Garner R. III Barbetta P. M. (1994). Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of science vocabulary by elementary students: A systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 179–180.
8. Gardner R. III Heward W. L. Grossi T. A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63–71.
9. Heward W. L. (1978). Visual response system. Exceptional Children, 44, 466–468.
10. Heward W. L. (1994). Three “low-tech” strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In Gardner R. III Sainato D. M. (eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283–320). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
11. Heward W. L. (1997). Four validated instructional strategies. Behavior and Social Issues, 7, 43–51.
12. Heward W. L. Courson F. H. Narayan J. S. (1989). Using choral responding to increase active student response during group instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 21, 72–75.
13. Marshall A. E. Heward W. L. (1979). Teaching self-management to incarcerated youth. Behavioral Disorders, 4, 215–226.
14. Narayan J. S. Heward W. L. Gardner R. III Courson F. H. Omness C. K. (1990). Using response cards to increase student participation in an elementary classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 483–490.
15. Pratton J. Hales L. W. (1986). The effects of active participation on student learning. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 210–215.
16. Sterling R. M. Barbetta P. M. Heward W. L. Heron T. E. (1997). A comparison of active student response and on-task instruction on the acquisition and maintenance of health facts by fourth grade special education students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 151–165.
17. Test D. W. Cooke N. L. Heron T. E. Heward W. L. (1983). Adapting visual response system technology to the regular classroom. Journal of Special Education Technology, 6, 15–26.
18. Wolf M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
19. Wyman R. A. (1968). A visual response system for small group instruction. Audio-Visual Instruction, 13, 714–717.
20. Wyman R. A. (1969). A visual response system for teacher-group interaction in the education of deaf children. Volta Review, 71, 155–160.