California's Yolo Bypass: Evidence that flood control can be compatible with fisheries, wetlands, wildlife, and agriculture

Fisheries

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 6-16

  Sommer, Ted ^a   Harrell, Bill ^b   Nobriga, Matt ^b   Brown, Randall ^b   Moyle, Peter ^a   Kimmerer, Wim ^c   Schemel, Larry ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES   (United States)

^c SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035593098     PISSN: 03632415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(2001)026<0006:CYB>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alpine, A. E., and J. E. Cloern. 1992. Trophic interactions and direct physical effects control phytoplankton biomass and production in an estuary. Limnology and Oceanography 37(5):946-955.
2. Bayley, P. B. 1991. The flood pulse advantage and the restoration of river-floodplain systems. Regulated Rivers 6:75-86.
3. Bennett, W. A., and P. B. Moyle. 1996. Where have all the fishes gone? Interactive factors producing fish declines in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary. Pages 519-542 in J. T. Hollibaugh, ed. San Francisco Bay: the ecosystem. Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, CA.
4. Bradford, M. J. 1997. An experimental study of stranding of juvenile salmonids on gravel bars and in sidechannels during rapid flow decreases. Regulated Rivers 13(5):395-401.
5. Brett, J. R. 1995. Energetics. Pages 3-68 in C. Groot, L. Margolis, and W. C. Clarke, eds. Physiological ecology of Pacific salmon. UBC Press, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
6. CALFED. 2000. Programmatic record of decision. August 28, 2000. CALFED, Sacramento. Available at www.calfed.water.ca.gov/current/ROD.html
7. Everest, F. H., and D. W. Chapman 1972. Habitat selection and spatial interaction by juvenile chinook salmon and steelhead trout in two Idaho streams. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29(1):91-100.
8. Fisher, F. W. 1994. Past and present status of Central Valley chinook salmon. Conservation Biology 8:870-873.
9. Galat, D. L., and 16 other authors. 1998. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands. Bioscience 48(9):721-734.
10. Garcia de Emiliani, M.O. 1997. Effects of water level fluctuations on phytoplankton in a river-floodplain lake system (Parana River, Argentina). Hydrobiologia 357: 1-15.
11. Healey, M. C. 1991. Life history of chinook salmon. Pages 311-394 in C. Groot and L. Margolis, eds. Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
12. Heiler, G, T. Hein, F. Schiemer, and G. Bornette. 1995. Hydrological connectivity and flood pulses as the central aspects for the integrity of river-floodplain systems. Regulated Rivers: 11(3/4): 351-362.
13. Hein, T. G. Heiler, D. Pennetzdorfer, P. Reidler, M. Schagerl, and F. Schiemer. 1999. The Danube restoration project: functional aspects and planktonic productivity in the floodplain system. Regulated Rivers: 15: 259-270.
14. Jassby, A. D., and J. E. Cloern. 2000. Organic matter sources and rehabilitation of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (California, USA). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 10(5):323-352.
15. Jassby, A. D., W. J. Kimmerer, S. G. Monismith, C. Armor, J. E. Cloern, T. M. Powell, L. R. Schubel, and T. J. Vendlinski. 1995. Isohaline position as a habitat indicator for estuarine populations. Ecological Applications 5:272-289.
16. Jassby, A. D., J. R. Koseff, and S. G. Monismith. 1996. Processes underlying phytoplankton variability in San Francisco Bay. Pages 325-350 in J. T. Hollibaugh, ed. San Francisco Bay: the ecosystem. Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, CA.
17. Junk, W. J., P.B. Bayley, and R. E. Sparks. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Special Publication of the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106:110-127.
18. Kelley, R. L. 1989. Battling the inland sea: floods, public policy, and the Sacramento Valley, 1985-1986. University of California Press, California Berkeley, CA.
19. Kjelson, M. A., P. F. Raquel, and F. W. Fisher. 1982. Life history of fall-run juvenile chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary, California. Pages 393-411 in VS. Kennedy, ed. Estuarine comparisons. Academic Press, New York.
20. Lehman, P. W. 1992. Environmental factors associated with long-term changes in chlorophyll concentration in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Bay, California. Estuaries 15(3): 335-348.
21. Lehman, P. W. 2000. The influence of climate on phytoplankton community biomass in San Francisco Bay Estuary. Limnology and Oceanography 45(3):580-590.
22. Levings, C.D., D.E. Boyle, and T.R. Whitehouse. 1995. Distribution and feeding of Pacific salmon in freshwater tidal creeks of the lower Fraser River, British Columbia. Fisheries Management and Ecology 2:299-308.
23. Mount, J. F. 1995. California's rivers and streams: the conflict between fluvial process and land use. University of California Press, Berkeley.
24. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California, 2nd Edition. University of California Press, Berkeley. In press.
25. Rasmussen, J. L. 1996. Draft American Fisheries Society position statement: floodplain management. Fisheries 21(4):6-10.
26. Richards, C., P.J. Cernera, M.P. Ramey, and D.W. Reiser. 1992. Development of off-channel habitats for use by juvenile chinook salmon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12:721-727.
27. Schemel, L. E., S. W. Hagar, and D. Childers. 1996. The supply and carbon content of suspended sediment from the Sacramento River to San Francisco Bay. Pages 237-260 in J.T. Hollibaugh, ed. San Francisco Bay: the ecosystem. Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, CA.
28. Schmidt, G.W. 1973. Primary production of phytoplankton in three types of Amazonian waters. Amazonia 4: 139-203.
29. Sommer, T., R. Baxter, and B. Herbold. 1997. The resilience of splittail in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126:961-976.
30. Sommer, T. R., M. L. Nobriga, W. C. Harrell, W. Batham, and W. J. Kimmerer. 2001. Floodplain rearing of juvenile chinook salmon: evidence of enchanced growth and survival. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58(2):325-333.
31. Swayles, S., R.B. Lauzier, and C.D. Levings. 1986. Winter habitat preferences of juvenile salmonids in two interior rivers in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64: 1506-1514.
32. Swales, S., and C.D. Levings 1989. Role of off-channel ponds in the life cycle of coho slamon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and other juvenile salmonids in the Coldwater River, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46: 232-242.
33. Toth, L. A., Obeyssekera, J. T. B., W. A. Perkins, and M. K. Loftin. 1993. Flow regulation and restoration of Florida's Kissimmee River. Regulated Rivers 8:155-166.
34. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1999. Final rule. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: determination of threatened status for the Sacramento splittail. Federal Register 64(25):5963-5981. February 8, 1999.