Campaign effects in theory and practice

American Politics Research

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 419-436

  Wlezien, Christopher ^a   Erikson, Robert S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035593064     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X01029005001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alvarez, R. M. (1997). Information and elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2. Campbell, J. E. (2000). The American campaign: U.S. presidential campaigns and the national vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
3. Campbell, J. E., & Garand, J. C. (2000). Before the vote: Forecasting American national elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Converse, P. E., & Traugott, M. W. (1986). Assessing the accuracy of polls and surveys. Science, 234, 1094-1098.
5. Crespi, I. (1988). Pre-election polling: Sources of accuracy and error. New York: Russell Sage.
6. Erikson, R. S., & Wlezien, C. (1998, August). The timeline of political campaigns. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
7. Erikson, R. S., & Wlezien, C. (1999). Presidential polls as a time series: The case of 1996. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 163-177.
8. Finkel, S. F. (1993). Reexamining the "minimal effects" model in recent presidential elections. Journal of Politics, 55, 1-21.
9. Franklin, M., & Wlezien, C. (in press). Reinventing election studies. Electoral Studies.
10. Gelman, A., & King, G. (1993). Why are American presidential election polls so variable when votes are so predictable? British Journal of Political Science, 23, 409-519.
11. Groves, R. M. (1989). Survey errors and survey costs. New York: John Wiley.
12. Holbrook, T. (1996). Do campaigns matter? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Johnston, R., Blais, A., Brady, H. E., & Crete, J. (1992). Letting the people decide: Dynamics of a Canadian election. Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen's Press.
14. Johnston, R., & Brady, H. (in press). The rolling cross section design. Electoral Studies.
15. Lau, R. (1994). An analysis of the accuracy of "trial heat" polls during the 1992 presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 2-20.
16. Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89, 309-326.
17. Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Shaw, D. R. (1999a). The effect of TV ads and candidates appearances on statewide presidential votes, 1988-96. American Political Science Review, 93, 345-362.
19. Shaw, D. R. (1999b). A study of presidential campaign event effects from 1952 to 1992. Journal of Politics, 61, 387-422.
20. Timpone, R. (1998). Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States. American Political Science Review, 92, 145-158.
21. Wlezien, C. (2000). An essay on "combined" time series processes. Electoral Studies, 19, 77-93.
22. Wlezien, C. (2001). On forecasting the presidential vote. PS: Political Science and Politics, 34, 25-31.
23. Wlezien, C., & Erikson, R. S. (in press). The timeline of presidential election campaigns. Journal of Politics.
24. Zaller, J. (in press). Assessing the statistical power of election studies to detect communication effects in political campaigns. Electoral Studies.