Measuring teamwork mental models to support training needs assessment, development, and evaluation: Two empirical studies

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 179-194

  Smith Jentsch, Kimberly A ^a   Campbell, Gwendolyn E ^a,b,c   Milanovich, Dana M ^d   Reynolds, Angelique M ^d  

^a Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division   (United States)

^b YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^d University of South Florida ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035586766     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.88     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Borko H, Livingston C. 1989. Cognition and improvisation: difference in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal 26: 473-498.
2. Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse SA. 1993. Shared mental models in expert tem decision making. In Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues, Castellan JJ, Jr. (eds.). LEA; Hillsdale NJ: 221-246.
3. Cannon-Bowers JA, Tannenbaum SI, Salas E, Volpe CE. 1995. Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, Guzzo R, Salas E. (eds), Jossey-Bass: San Francisco; 330-380.
4. Chi MTH, Koeske RD. 1983. Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology 19: 29-39.
5. Kleinman DL, Serfaty D. 1989. Team performance assessment in distributed decision making. Proceedings of the Interactive Networked Simulation for Training, Orlando, FL; 22-27.
6. Lee WC, Rodgers JL. 1998. Bootstrapping correlation coefficients using univariate and bivariate sampling. Psychological Methods 3: 91-103.
7. Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. 2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 273-283.
8. MatLab: The Language of Technical Computing. Version 5. 1996. The Math Works, Inc.
9. Rasmussen JL. 1989. Computer intensive correlation analysis: bootstrap and approximate randomization techniques. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 42: 103-111.
10. Rentsch JR, Klimoski RJ. 2001. Why do 'great minds' think alike?: Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22: 107-120.
11. Rentsch JR, Heffner TS, Duffy LT. 1994. What you know is what you get from experience: team experience related to teamwork schemas. Group and Organization Management 19: 450-474.
12. Rouse WB, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E. 1992. The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 22: 1296-1308.
13. Smith-Jentsch KA, Johnston JH, Payne SC. 1998a. Measuring team-related expertise in complex environments. In Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds). APA: Washington, DC; 271-297.
14. Smith-Jentsch KA, Zeisig RL, Acton B, McPherson JA. 1998b. Team dimensional training: a strategy for guided team self-correction. In Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training, Cannon-Bowers J, Salas E (eds). APA: Washington, DC; 271-297.
15. Smith-Jentsch KA, Milanovich DM, Fowlkes JE, Ziulkowski S. 1999. Training pilots to assess aircrew coordination behaviors. The Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Ohio State University. Columbus, OH: 317-322.
16. Smith-Jentsch KA, Blickensderfer E, Salas E. 2000. Helping team members help themselves: propositions for facilitating guided team self-correction. In Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, Beyerlein M, Johnson D, Beyerlein S (eds). Vol. 6, JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 55-72.
17. Sundstrom E, De Meuse KP, Futrell D. 1990. Work teams: applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist 45: 120-133.