Evidence production in adversarial vs. inquisitorial regimes

Economics Letters

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 267-272

  Froeb, Luke M ^a   Kobayashi, Bruce H ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

D83; Evidence; Information production; K41; Litigation; Procedure

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035586116     PISSN: 01651765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00356-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Block M.K., Parker J.S., Vyborna O., Dusek L. An experimental comparison of adversarial versus inquisitorial regimes. American Law and Economics Review. 1999;. In press.
2. Cooter R.D., Rubinfeld D.L. An economic model of legal discovery. Journal of Legal Studies. 23:1994;435-463.
3. Daughety A.F., Reinganum J.F. On the Economics of Trials: Adversarial Process, Evidence and Equilibrium Bias. 1998;Vanderbilt. Working paper # 98-W02.
4. DeGroot M. Optimal Statistical Decisions. 1970;McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. Dewatripont M., Tirole J. Advocates. Journal of Political Economy. 107:1999;1-39.
6. Froeb L., Kobayashi B. Naive, biased, yet Bayesian: can juries interpret selectively-produced evidence. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 12:1996;257-276.
7. Hay B.L. Civil discovery: its effects and optimal scope. Journal of Legal Studies. 23:1994;481-515.
8. Jost P.J. Disclosure of information and incentive for care. International Review of Law and Economics. 15:1995;265-285.
9. Lewis T., Poitevin M. Disclosure of information in regulatory proceedings. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 13:1997;50-74.
10. Malliaris A.G., Brock W.A. Stochastic Methods in Economics and Finance. 1982;North Holland, New York.
11. McAfee R.P., Reny P. Correlated information and mechanism design. Econometrica. 60:1992;395-421.
12. Milgrom P., Roberts J. Relying on the information of interested parties. Rand Journal of Economics. 17:1986;18-32.
13. Parisi F. Rent-seeking through litigation: adversarial and inquisitoral systems compared. International Review of Law and Economics. 2000;. In press.
14. Parker J.S., Lewisch P. Materielle Wahrheitsfindung im Zivilprozess [The revelation of truth in civil procedure. Lewisch P., Rechberger W.H. 100 Jahre ZPO: Okonomische Analyse des Civilprozesses [Civil Procedure Code Centennial: Economic Analysis of Civil Procedure. 1998;203-223 Manz, Wien.
15. Parker J.S., Kobayashi B.H. Evidence. Bouckaert B., De Geest G. The Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Vol. 5:1999;290-306 Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
16. Posner R. The law and economics of economics expert witnesses. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 13:1999;91-99.
17. Rothschild M. Searching for the lowest price with the distribution of prices is unknown. Journal of Political Economy. 16:1974;689-711.
18. Shin H.S. Adversarial and inquisitorial procedures in arbitration. RAND Journal of Economics. 29:1998;378-405.
19. Sabel J. An analysis of discovery rules. Law and Contemporary Problems. 52:1989;133-159.