The role of character assessments in presidential approval

American Politics Research

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 196-210

  Greene, Steven ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035586091     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X01029002004     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abelson, R., Kinder, D., Peters, M., & Fiske, S. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 619-630.
2. Aldrich, J., Sullivan, J., & Borgida, E. (1989). Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates "waltz before a blind audience"? American Political Science Review, 83, 123-141.
3. Brace, P., & Hinckley, B. (1991). The structure of presidential approval: Constraints within and across presidencies. Journal of Politics, 53, 993-1017.
4. Brody, R. (1991). Assessing the president. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Clarke, H. D., & Stewart, M. C. (1994). Prospections, retrospections, and rationality: The "bankers" model of presidential approval reconsidered. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 104-1123.
7. Conover, P., & Feldman, S. (1986). The role of inference in the perception of political candidates. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition (pp. 127-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Gilens, M. (1988). Gender and support for Reagan: A comprehensive model of presidential approval. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 19-49.
10. Kernell, S. (1978). Explaining presidential popularity. American Political Science Review, 72, 506-522.
11. Kinder, D. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition (pp. 233-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. MacKuen, M., Erikson, R., & Stimson, J. (1992). Peasants or bankers: The American electorate and the U.S. economy. American Political Science Review, 86, 597-611.
13. McCurley, C., & Mondak, J. J. (1995). Inspected by #1184063113: The influence of incumbents' competence and integrity in U.S. House elections. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 864-885.
14. Miller, A., Wattenberg, M., & Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 80, 521-540.
15. Norpoth, H. (1996). Presidents and the prospective voter. Journal of Politics, 58, 776-805.
16. Ostrom, C., & Simon, D. (1988). The president's public. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 1096-1119.
17. Popkin, S. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Ragsdale, L. (1996). Vital statistics on the presidency: Washington to Clinton. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
19. Rahn, W., Aldrich, J., Borgida, E., & Sullivan, J. (1990). A social-cognitive model of candidate appraisal. In J. Ferejohn & M. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information in democratic processes (pp. 136-159). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
20. Schneider, D. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 294-319.
21. Sullivan, J., Aldrich, J., Borgida, E., & Rahn, W. (1990). Candidate appraisal and human nature: Man and superman in the 1984 election. Political Psychology, 11, 459-484.