Developments in digital journals

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 260-283

  Halliday, Leah ^a   Oppenheim, Charles ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035583718     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000007102     Document Type: Article

References (153)

1. Page, G., Campbell, R. and Meadows, J. Journal publishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
2. Greenhalgh, C., Oppenheim, C. and Rowland, F. The future of scholarly journal publishing. Journal of Documentation, 56(4), 2000, 361-398.
3. Page, G. The economics of traditional journal publishing. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry. Aldershot: Gower, 1993, 61-87.
4. Borgman, C. Round in circles: the scholar as author and end user in the electronic environment. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry. Aldershot: Gower, 1993, 45-59.
5. Meadows, A.J. Communicating research. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press, 1998.
6. Smith, J.W.T. The deconstructed journal - a new model for academic publishing. Learned Publishing, 12(2), 1999, 79-91.
7. Burrows, T. Serials collection management: the academic library. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry. Aldershot: Gower, 1993, 207-222.
8. Meadows, J. Too much of a good thing? Quality versus quantity. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry. Aldershot: Gower, 1993, 23-43.
9. Readings, B. Caught in the net: notes from the electronic underground. Surfaces, 14, 1994. http://tornade.ere.umontreal.ca/~guedon/Surfaces/ vol14/readings.html (visited 13 October 2000).
10. McKnight, C. and Richardson, J. The impact of new publishing media. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry, Aldershot: Gower, 1993, 89-106.
11. Harter, S.P. Scholarly communication and electronic journals: an impact study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(9), 1998, 507-516.
12. Woodward, H. and Pilling, S. The international serials industry: an overview. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry. Aldershot: Gower, 1993, 1-22.
13. Johnson, R., Bovenschulte, R. and Vaughn, S.L. SPARC - creating solutions through partnerships. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 23(4), 1999, 495-497.
14. Bensman, S.J. Wrong economic model for the ARL SPARC program? Newsletter on Serials Pricing Issues, 216.3, 1999. http://www.lib.unc. edu/prices/1999/PRIC216.HTML#216.3 (visited 22 May 2000).
15. Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. What authors want: the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals. London: ALPSP, 1999.
16. Harnad, S. PostGutenberg galaxy: how to get there from here. 1995. http://cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/THES/thes.html (visited 13 October 2000).
17. Harnad, S. Free at last: the future of peer-reviewed journals. D-Lib Magazine, 5(12), 1999. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad. html (visited 13 October 2000).
18. Garfield, E. Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley, 1979.
19. Gomes, S. and Meadows, J. Perceptions of electronic journals in British universities. Scholarly Publishing, 29, 1998, 174-181.
20. Wells, A. Exploring the development of the independent, electronic, scholarly journal. MSc dissertation in Information Management, Sheffield University, 1999.
21. Association of Research Libraries, Association of American Universities and the Pew Higher Education Roundtable. To publish and perish. Policy Perspectives, 7(4), 1998. http://www.arl.org/scomm/pew/pewrept.html (visited 13 October 2000).
22. Denning, P.J. Journals end? An editorial commentary. Computing Research News, September 1996. http://www.acm.org/pubs/Journals End.html (visited 13 October 2000).
23. Vickery, B. A century of scientific and technical information. Journal of Documentation, 55(5), 1999, 476-527.
24. Association of Research Libraries. Principles for emerging systems of scholarly publishing. 2000. http://www.arl.org/scomm/tempe.html (visited 13 October 2000).
25. Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. Trends in scientific scholarly journal publishing in the United States. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 28, 1997, 135-170.
26. Fisher, J.H. Comparing electronic journals to print journals: are there savings? Session 1, Economics of electronic publishing: cost issues. Paper presented at Scholarly Communication and Technology, a conference organised by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation at Emory University, 24-25 April 1997. 1997. http://arl.cni.org/scomm/scat/fisher.html (visited 13 October 2000).
27. Scupola, A. The impact of electronic commerce on the publishing industry: towards a business value complementarity framework of electronic publishing. Journal of Information Science, 25(2), 1999, 133-145.
28. Electronic Publishing Services Ltd. Scientific, technical and medical journal publishing: a market in transition. London: EPS Ltd, 1999.
29. Jacobs, N.A., Chambers, J. and Morris, A. Document delivery websites. Interlending and Document Supply, 27(2), 1999, 65-70.
30. Publishers Association/Joint Information Systems Committee Working Group on Inter-Library Loan. Report of the working group. 1999. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/curriss/collab/c6_pub/iludd-wg.html (visited 13 October 2000).
31. Joint Information Systems Committee. A new model for document delivery: a proposal to the PA and JISC. 1999. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/pub99/ ip-edd-prop.html (visited 13 October 2000).
32. Joint Information Systems Committee. Request for proposals: pilot project for the supply of electronic documents complementing 'inter-library loan'. 1999. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/pub99/jp-edd-mainrfp.html (visited 13 October 2000).
33. Singleton, A. Opportunities, threats and myths in journals. Learned Publishing, 12(2), 1999, 97-105.
34. Anon. ScienceDirect: provider and mediator. International Journal of Electronic Library Research, 1(2), 1997, 163-164.
35. Duff, K. Costs of journals publishing, [email] 12 August 1998. http://www.library. yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/9812/msg00023.html (visited 13 October 2000).
36. Friend, F. Authority to sign licenses: how much staff time, [email] 1 March 1999. http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/9903/msg00001. html (visited 13 October 2000).
37. Okerson, A. Scholarly communication and the licensing of electronic publications. In: Butterworth, I., ed. The impact of electronic publishing on the academic community. London: Portland Press, 1998. http://tiepac. portlandpress.co.uk/books/online/tiepac/session5/ch2.htm (visited 13 October 2000).
38. Robnett, B. Online journal pricing. Serials Librarian, 33, 1998, 55-69.
39. Brennan, P., Hersey, K. and Harper, G. Licensing electronic resources: strategic and practical consideration for signing electronic information delivery agreements. 1997. http://arl.cni.org/scomm/licensing/licbooklet. html (visited 13 October 2000).
40. Duranceau, E.F. Beyond print: revisioning serials acquisition for the digital age. 1997. http://web.mit.edu/waynej/www/duranceau.htm (visited 13 October 2000).
41. National Electronic Site Licence Initiative. NESLI home page. 2000. http://www.nesli.ac.uk (visited 13 October 2000).
42. Higher Education Funding Council for England. Report on Phase 1 of the evaluation of the UK Pilot Site Licence Initiative. Ref M3/97. 1997. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/1997/m3_97.htm (visited 13 October 2000).
43. Hitchcock, S., Carr, L. and Hall, W. Web journals: a UK perspective. Serials, 10(3), 1997, 285-299. http://journals.Ecs.soton.ac.uk/uksg.htm (visited 13 October 2000).
44. Gerrard, J.C. Pricing crisis revisited. Newsletter on Serials Pricing Issues, 236.1, 1999. http://www.lib.unc.edu/prices/1999/pric236.html (visited 13 October 2000).
45. Summers, D. Preferred pricing model for journals. [email] 12 November 1999. http://www.mailbase.ac.uk/ lists/lis-serials/1999-11/0002.html (visited 13 October 2000).
46. Higher Education Funding Council for England. Evaluation of the UK Pilot Site Licence Initiative - Phase II, Ref 98/22. 1998. http://www.hefce. ac.uk/pubs/hefce/1998/98%5F22.htm (visited 13 October 2000).
47. Carter, P. Site licence concept: a view of the Pilot Site Licence Initiative. Learned Publishing, 10, 1997, 319-322.
48. Sosteric, M. At the speed of thought: pursuing non-commercial alternatives to scholarly communication. ARL: a Bimonthly Newsletter for Research Library Issues and Actions, October 1999, 17-19.
49. Okerson, A. A librarian's view of some economic issues in the electronic scientific publishing. UNESCO Invitational Meeting on the Future of Scientific Information, Paris, February 1996. http://www.library.yale.edu/ ~okerson/unesco.html (visited 13 October 2000).
50. Deegan, M. The electronic library in teaching and research. In: Hanson, J. and Day, J., eds. Managing the electronic library: a practical guide for information professionals. London: Bowker-Saur, 1998, 184-185.
51. Kidd, T. Marketing institutional journal subscriptions to academic libraries. Learned Publishing, 12(3), 1999, 201-207.
52. Spinella, M.P. Developing viable electronic journals. Serials, 12(2), 1999, 111-117.
53. Picerno, P. Preferred pricing model for journals. [email] 13 November 1999. http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/9911/msg00036html (visited 13 October 2000).
54. Winship, I. Preferred pricing model for journals, [email] 15 November 1999. http://www.library.yale.edu~llicense/ListArchives/9911/msg00038html (visited 13 October 2000).
55. Prior, A. Electronic journals pricing - still in the melting pot? UKDSG 22nd annual conference, 12-14 April 1999, UMIST, Manchester, UK. Serials, 12(2), 1999, 111-117.
56. McKnight, C. and Richardson, J. The impact of new publishing media. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry. Aldershot: Gower, 1993, 1993, 89-106.
57. Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. Preserving digital information. Commission on Preservation and Access and the Research Libraries Group. 1996. http://www.rlg.org/ArchTF/tfadi.index.htm (visited 13 October 2000).
58. Koehler, W. An analysis of web page and web site constancy and permanence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1999, 162-180.
59. Kling, R. and McKim, G. Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1999, 890-906.
60. National Preservation Office. Digital culture: maximising the nation's investment. A synthesis of JISC/NPO studies on the preservation of electronic materials. London: National Preservation Office, 1999.
61. Beagrie, N. and Greenstein, D. A strategic policy framework for creating and preserving digital collections. 1998. http://ahds.ac.uk/manage/ framework.htm#sec2 (visited 13 October 2000).
62. Rothenberg, J. Avoiding technological quicksand: finding a viable technical foundation for digital preservation. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 1999.
63. Haynes, D., Streatfield, D., Jowett, T. and Blake, M. Responsibility for digital archiving and long-term access to digital data, a JISC/NPO study on the preservation of electronic materials. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ services/papers/bl/jisc-npo67/digital-preservation.html (visited 13 October 2000).
64. Dementi, M.A.E. Access and archiving as a new paradigm. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 3(3), 1998. http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/ 03-03/dementi.html (visited 13 October 2000).
65. Hedstrom, M. and Montgomery, S. Digital preservation needs and requirements in RLG member institutions. 1998. http://www.rlg.org/ preserv/digpres.html (visited 13 October 2000).
66. Lynch, C. Civilising the information ecology: views of information landscapes for a learning society. In: Criddle, S., Dempsey, L. and Heseltine, R., eds. Information Landscapes for a Learning Society: Networking and the Future of Libraries 3. London: Library Association Publishing, 1999, 257-267.
67. Guthrie, K.M. JSTOR: the development of a cost-driven, value-based pricing model. Paper presented at Scholarly Communication and Technology, a conference organised by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation at Emory University, 24-25 April 1997. http://www.arl.org/scomm/scat/guthries. html (visited 13 October 2000).
68. Guthrie, K.M. JSTOR: from project to independent organization. D-Lib Magazine, July/August 1997. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july97/07guthrie. html (visited 13 October 2000).
69. Guthrie, K.M. and Lougee, W.P. The JSTOR solution accessing and preserving the past. Library Journal, 122(2), 1997, 42-44.
70. Guthrie, K.M. JSTOR and the University of Michigan: an evolving collaboration. Library Hi Tech, 16(1), 1998, 9-15.
71. Garlock, K.L., Landis, W.E. and Piontek, S. Redefining access to scholarly journals: a progress report on JSTOR. Serials Review, 23(1), 1997, 1-8.
72. British Library. British Library Research and Innovation Centre. 2000. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/papers/bl (visited 13 October 2000).
73. CEDARS. Home page. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/ (visited 27 April 2000).
74. Commission on Preservation and Access. Home page. 2000. http://www.clir.org/cpa/ (visited 27 April 2000).
75. Digital Library Federation. DLA initiatives. 2000. http://www.clir.org/ diglib/dlfinit.htm (visited 27 April 2000).
76. International Federation of Archives Committee. Home page. 2000. http://www.ica.org (visited 13 October 2000).
77. Research Libraries Group Preservation Program. Home page. 2000. http://www.rlg.org/preserv/index.html (visited 13 October 2000).
78. Morris, A., Jacobs, N., Woodfield, J., Davies, E. and McKnight, C. FIDDO (Focused Investigation of Document Delivery Options) final report -Document delivery in a hybrid environment. Loughborough: Loughborough University, 1999.
79. Tuck, B. and Grieves, M. The impact of electronic journals on local network computing and printing: an eLib supporting study. London: LITC, South Bank University, 1998. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/dlis/models/ studies/printing/printing.html (visited 13 October 2000).
80. Gazzale, R.S. and Mackie-Mason, J.K. System design, user cost and electronic usage of journals. Paper presented at PEAK conference, 22 March 2000, University of Michigan. http://www.si.umich.edu/PEAK-2000/abstracts.htm#Gazzale (visited 13 October 2000).
81. Mackie-Mason, J.K., Riveros, J.F., Bonn, M.S. and Lougee, W.P. A report on the PEAK experiment: usage and economic behaviour. D-Lib Magazine, 5(7/8), July/August 1999. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july99/ mackie-mason/07mackie-mason.html (visited 13 October 2000).
82. McKnight, C. Electronic journals: what do users think of them? Paper presented at an International Symposium on Research, Development and Practice in Digital Libraries. ISDL '97, 18-21 November 1997, Koichi Tabata (University of Library and Information Science), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. 1997. http://www.dl.ulis.ac.jp/ISDL97/proceedings/mcknight.html (visited 13 October 2000).
83. Jenkins, C. User studies: electronic journals and user response to new models of information delivery. Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory, 21, 1997, 355-363.
84. Edwards, C., Day, J.M. and Walton, G., eds. Monitoring organizational and cultural change: the impact on people of electronic libraries - the IMPEL2 Project: an eLib supporting study. London: LITC, South Bank University, 1998.
85. Rusch-Feja, D. and Siebeky, U. Evaluation of usage and acceptance of electronic journals. D-Lib Magazine, 5(10), 1999. http://www.dlib.org/ dlib/october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja-full-report.html (visited 13 October 2000).
86. SuperJournal. Summary of SuperJournal findings. 1999. http://irwell. mimas.ac.uk/sj (visited 13 October 2000).
87. Eason, K., Yu, L. and Harker, S. The use and usefulness of functions in electronic journals: the experience of the SuperJournal Project. Program, 34(1), 2000, 1-28.
88. Kasdorf, W. SGML and PDF - why we need both. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 3(4), 1998. www.press.umich.edu/jep/03-04/kasdorf.html (visited 13 October 2000).
89. Rowland, F., Bell, I. and Falconer, C. Human and economic factors affecting the acceptance of electronic journals by readers. Canadian Journal of Communication, 22, 1997, 61-75.
90. Haynes, J. New Journal of Physics: a web-based and author funded journal. Learned Publishing, 12(4), 1999, 265-269.
91. Fletcher, L.A. Developing an integrated approach to electronic publishing: tailoring your content for the Web. Learned Publishing, 12(2), 1999, 107-117.
92. CrossRef. Home page. 2000. www.crossref.org (visited 13 October 2000).
93. Harnad, S. Implementing peer review on the net: scientific quality control in scholarly electronic journals. In: Peek, R. and Newby, G., eds. Scholarly publishing: the electronic frontier. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996, 103-118.
94. Fishwick, F., Edwards, L. and Blagden, J. Economic implications of different models of publishing scholarly electronic journals for professional societies and other small or specialist publishers. Report to the Joint Information Systems Committee Electronic Libraries Programme. London: South Bank University, 1998. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/ elib/papers/tavistock/scholarly-journals/cranelib.html (visited 13 October 2000).
95. Moore Sievers, A. Serials prices and scholarly publishing. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry. Aldershot: Gower, 1993, 187-206.
96. Mullis, A.A. Access to serials: national and international cooperation. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry. Aldershot: Gower, 1993, 233-258.
97. Stoller, M. A., Christopherson, R. and Miranda, M. The economics of professional journal pricing. College & Research Libraries, 57, 1996, 9-21.
98. Wyly, B.J. Competition in scholarly publishing? What publisher profits reveal. ARL: a Bimonthly Newsletter for Research Library Issues and Actions, October, 1998, 7-13.
99. Brown, D. New horizons in journal and article provision: journal versus article delivery. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry. Aldershot: Gower, 1993, 307-324.
100. Hipps, K. Update on scholarly publisher profits. Association of Research Libraries Bimonthly Report, 207, 2000. http://www.arl.org/newsltr/207/ pubprofits.html (visited 13 October 2000).
101. Bot, M., Burgmeester, J. and Roes, H. The cost of publishing an electronic journal: a general model and a case study. D-Lib Magazine, November 1998. http://mirrored.ukoln.ac.uk/lis-journals/dlib/dlib/dlib/november98/ 11roes.html (visited 13 October 2000).
102. Duranceau, E.F. The economics of electronic publishing. Serials Review, 21, 1995, 77-90.
103. Harnad, S. and Hemus, M. All or none: no stable hybrid or half-way solutions for launching the learned periodical literature into the post-Gutenburg galaxy. In: Butterworth, I., ed. The impact of electronic publishing on the academic community. London: Portland Press, 1998. http://tiepac.portlandpress.co.uk/books/online/tiepac/session1/ch5.htm/ (visited 13 October 2000).
104. Hitchcock, S., Carr, L. and Hall, W. Linking electronic journals: lessons from the Open Journals Project. D-Lib Magazine, December 1998. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december98/12hitchcock.html (visited 13 October 2000).
105. O'Donnell, J. Can E-journals save us - a scholar's view. In: Butler, M.A. and Kingma, B.R., eds. The economics of information in a networked environment. Proceedings of a Conference Challenging Marketplace Solutions to Problems in the Economics of Information, Washington, DC, 18-19 September 1995. Washington, DC: American Research Libraries, 1996, 123-126.
106. Odlyzko, A. The economics of electronic publishing. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4, 1998. http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-01/odlyzko.html (visited 13 October 2000).
107. Odlyzko, A. The evolution of electronic scholarly communication. 1999. http://www.research.att.com/%7Eamo/doc/evolution.communications.txt (visited 13 October 2000).
108. Pope, S. and Miller, L. Using the web for peer review and publication of scientific journals. Learning by doing. The Conservation Ecology Project. 1998. http://www.consecol.org/Journal/consortium.html (visited 13 October 2000).
109. Varian, H. The future of electronic journals. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4, 1998. http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-01/varian.html (visited 13 October 2000).
110. Abate, T. Publishing scientific journals online. Bioscience, 47, 1997, 175-179.
111. Day, C. Digital alternatives: solving the problem or shifting the costs? Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4, 1998. http://www.press.umich.edu/ jep/04-01/day.html (visited 13 October 2000).
112. Frey, K.L. Business models and pricing issues in the digital domain. Journal of Library Administration, 24, 1997, 27-37.
113. Garson, L.R. Can electronic journals save us? - a publisher's view. In: Butler, M.E. and Kingma, B.R., eds. The economics of information in a networked environment. Proceedings of a Conference Challenging Marketplace Solutions to Problems in the Economics of Information, Washington, DC, 18-19 September 1995. Washington, DC: American Research Libraries, 1996, 115-121.
114. Lesk, M. Practical digital libraries: books, bytes and bucks. San Francisco, Calif.: Morgan Kauffman, 1997.
115. Lustig, H. Electronic publishing economic issues in a time of transition. Astrophysics and Space Science, 247, 1998, 1-2.
116. Regier, W.G. Electronic publishing is cheaper. Session 1, Economics of electronic publishing: cost issues. Paper presented at Scholarly Communication and Technology, a conference organised by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation at Emory University, 24-25 April 1997. 1997. http://arl.cni.org/scomm/ scat/regier.html (visited 13 October 2000).
117. International Coalition of Library Consortia (ICOLC). Statement on current perspectives and preferred practices for the selection and purchase of electronic infrastructure. 1998. http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/ statement.html (visited 13 October 2000).
118. Elliot, R. The impact of electronic publishing on the scientific information chain. IFLA Journal, 23, 1997, 351-355.
119. King, D.W. Some economic aspects of publishing scholarly journals on the web. Newsidic, 138, 1998, 11-15.
120. Mabe, M. SuperJournal: a publisher's perspective. Paper presented at UKSG Conference, Exeter, 1 April 1998. Serials, 11, 1998, 117-126.
121. Neal, J.G. The use of scholarly journals: models of analysis and data drawn from the Project MUSE experience at Johns Hopkins University. Paper presented at Scholarly Communication and Technology, a conference organised by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, at Emory University, 24-25 April 1997. 1997. http://www.arl.org/scomm/scat/ neal.html (visited 13 October 2000).
122. University of California Libraries. Principles for acquiring and licensing information in digital formats. 1996. http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Info/ principles.html (visited 13 October 2000).
123. Hunter, K. The effect of price: early observations. Paper presented at Scholarly Communication and Technology, a conference organised by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation at Emory University, 24-25 April 1997. 1997. http://www.arl.org/scomm/scat/hunter.html (visited 13 October 2000).
124. Hunter, K. Electronic journal publishing: observations from inside. D-Lib Magazine, July 1998. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/July98/07hunter.html (visited 13 October 2000).
125. Barr, M. Where does the money go? Newsletter on Serials Pricing Issues, 229, 1999. http://www.lib.unc.edu/prices1999/pric229.html (visited 13 October 2000).
126. McLean, N. The global scholarly information infrastructure: the quest for sustainable solutions. Paper given at Beyond the Beginning: the Global Digital Library, 1997. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/papers/b1/blri078/ content/repor~10.htm (visited 13 October 2000).
127. Pipenburg, S. Journal of Mammology - price increase. Newsletter on Serials Pricing Issues, 237, 8 November 1999. http://www.lib.unc.edu/ prices/1999/pric237.html237.2 (visited 13 October 2000).
128. Joint Funding Council's Libraries Review Group. Report (Follett Report). December 1993. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/papers/follett/report/ (visited 13 October 2000).
129. Arjoon, R. (In)efficient market models: the reality behind economic models in the publishing industry. Learned Publishing, 12(2), 1999, 127-133.
130. Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. SPARC home page. 1999. http://www.lib.utexas.edu/ejour/SPARC.html (visited 13 October 2000).
131. Wilkinson, F.C., Dennis, N.K. and Rosen, B. Back to the future: at last librarians chart a new course in scholarly electronic publishing. Against the Grain, 9(5), 1997, 80-85, 93.
132. Rowe, R. New horizons in journal and article provision: subscription services in a changing marketplace. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry. Aldershot: Gower, 1993, 149-162.
133. Institute of Physics Publishing. New Journal of Physics, 2000. http://www.njp.org (visited 13 October 2000).
134. Halliday, L. and Oppenheim, C. Economic models for the digital library, an eLib supporting study. Bath: UKOLN, 1999. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ services/elib/papers/ukoln/emod-diglib/finalreport.pdf (visited 13 October 2000).
135. Council of Academic and Professional Publishers. The student market today. London: Publishers Association, 1998.
136. McKnight, C. and Price, S. A survey of author attitudes and skills in relation to article publishing in paper and electronic journals. Journal of Documentation, 55(5), 1999, 556-576.
137. Buckholtz, A. Electronic genesis: e-journals in the sciences. Academe, 85(5), September/October 1999, 65. http://www.arl.org/sparc/core/index. asp?page=f23 (visited 13 October 2000).
138. Butler, D. One-stop shop for 200 life science journals. Nature, 399, 1999, 720.
139. Case, M. Capitalizing on competition: the economic underpinnings of SPARC. Paper presented at the PEAK conference, 24 March 2000, University of Michigan. http://www.si.umich.edu/PEAK-2000/case.pdf (visited 13 October 2000).
140. Rosenzweig, M.L. Reclaiming what we own: expanding competition in scholarly publishing. Plenary address to the Ninth Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, Detroit, Michigan, 11 April 1999. http://www.arl.org/sparc/rosenzweig.html (visited 13 October 2000).
141. Evolutionary Ecology.com. Table of contents, vol. 1, January-December 1999. http://www.evolutionary-ecology.com/v0.html (visited 13 October 2000).
142. Keller, M.A. Science, scholarship and internet publishing: the HighWire story. Syllabus, 12(3), 1998.
143. Keller, M.A. Returning responsibility for scholarly communication to the academy. Paper presented at an International Symposium on Electronic Journals, Berlin, 16-17 February 1998. http://www-sul.stanford.edu/staff/ pubs/makpaper.html (visited 13 October 2000).
144. Nature. Biology back issues free as publishers walk HighWire. Nature, 404, 2000, 117.
145. HighWire Press. Home page. http://intl.highwire.org (visited 13 October 2000).
146. Stanford University News Service. HighWire Press ensures that online publications don't get lost in cyberspace. 4 February 2000. www. stanford.edu/dept/news/pr/00/000204highwire.html (visited 13 October 2000).
147. Morris, S. Who needs publishers? Journal of Information Science, 25(1), 1999, 85-88.
148. Homes, A. Electronic publishing in science: reality check. Canadian Journal of Communication, 22(3/4), 1997, 105-116.
149. Odlyzko, A. Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42, 1995, 71-122.
150. Smith, A.P. The journal as overlay on preprint databases. Learned Publishing, 13(1), January 2000, 43-48.
151. Kiernan, V. Paying for the article: libraries test a new model for scholarly journals. Chronicle of Higher Education, 14 August 1998. http://www.lib. umich.edu/libhome/peak/chronicle.htm (visited 13 October 2000).
152. Bonn, M.S., Lougee, W.P., Mackie-Mason, J.K. and Riveros, J.F. A report on the PEAK experiment: context and design. D-Lib Magazine, 5(6), June 1999. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june99/06bonn.html (visited 13 October 2000).
153. Covi, L.M. Material mastery: situating digital library use in university research practices. Information Processing & Management, 35, 1999, 293-316.