The Danish "miracle": Luck, pluck, or stuck?

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 131-155

  Schwartz, Herman M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035580481     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414001034002001     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alchian, A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211-221.
2. Amin, A., & Thomas, D. (1996). The negotiated economy: State and civic institutions in Denmark. Economy and Society, 25, 255-281.
3. Anderson, J. G. (1997). The Scandinavian welfare model in crisis? Scandinavian Political Studies, 20, 1-31.
4. Annerstedt, J. (1989). "Industrial modernists" and "national programmers" for high technology. In Jørgen Lingaard Pedersen (Ed.), Technology policy in Denmark (pp. 125-158). Copenhagen, Denmark: Fredriksberg Bogtrykkeri.
5. Christensen, J. G. (2000). Between social democracy and liberalism: The governance of education. In E. Albaek, L. Eliason, A. S. Nørgaard, & H. Schwartz, (Eds.), Managing the Danish welfare state under pressure. Aarhus, Denmark: University of Aarhus Press.
6. Christiansen, P. M. (1989). The Danish policy on technology. In Jørgen Lingaard Pedersen (Ed.), Technology policy in Denmark (pp. 31-60). Copenhagen, Denmark: Fredriksberg Bogtrykkeri.
7. Christiansen, P. M. (2000). Public expenditures: Is the welfare state manageable? In E. Albaek, L. Eliason, A. S. Nørgaard, & H. Schwartz (Eds.), Managing the Danish welfare state under pressure. Aarhus, Denmark: University of Aarhus Press.
8. Christiansen, P. M., & Sidenius, N. C. (1988). Forsknings - og teknologipolitik i Danmark [Research and development policy in Denmark]. Politica, 20, 246-268.
9. Cox, R. H. (1999, September). The social construction of an imperative: Why welfare reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands, but not in Germany. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
10. Due, J., Madsen, J. S., Jensen, C. S., & Petersen, L. K. (1994). The survival of the Danish model. Copenhagen, Denmark: DJØF.
11. Eliason, L. (1992). Reading the cards on the table. Scandinavian Studies, 64, 544-581.
12. Genschel, P. (1997). Dynamics of inertia: Institutional persistence and change in health care and telecommunications. Governance, 10, 43-66.
13. Hansen, J. B., & Pallesen, T. (1998, September). The fiscal manipulation of a decentralized public sector. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
14. Horwitz, E. (1984). Export performance of the Nordic economies 1965-1982: A constant market shares analysis. In DØR Sekretariet (Ed.), Economic growth in a Nordic perspective (pp. 259-299). Copenhagen, Denmark: Det Økonomist Råd.
15. Lindbeck, A., Sandmo, A., & Petersson, O. (1994). Turning Sweden around. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17. March, J., & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. New York: Free Press.
18. Martin, A. (1996). What does globalization have to do with the erosion of welfare states? Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
19. Nannestad, P. (1991). Danish design or British disease. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
20. Nielsen, K. (1991). Learning to manage the supply side. In B. Jessop, H. Kastendiek, K. Nielsen, & O. K. Pedersen (Eds.), The politics of flexibility (pp. 282-313). Aldershot, England: Edgar Elgar.
21. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1984). Economic survey: Denmark, 1984. Paris: Author.
22. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1992). Revenue statistics of member countries. Paris: Author.
23. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1994). Economic survey: Denmark, 1994. Paris: Author.
24. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1996). Economic survey: Denmark, 1996. Paris: Author.
25. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1997). Economic survey: Denmark, 1997. Paris: Author.
26. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1999a). Economic outlook # 65. Paris: Author.
27. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1999b). Economic survey: Denmark, 1999. Paris: Author.
28. Pontusson, J., & Swenson, P. (1996). Labor markets, production strategies and wage bargaining institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 29, 223-250.
29. Saltman, R., & von Otter, C. (1992). Planned markets and public competition. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
30. Scharpf, F. (1997). Games real actors play. Boulder, CO: Westview.
31. Schou, B. (1988). Udgiftsstyring eller fornyelse? [Expenditure control or renewal?] In K.-H. Bentzon (Ed.), Fra Vœkst til Omstilling [From growth to adaptation] (pp. 333-363). Copenhagen, Denmark: Frederiksberg Bogtrykkeri.
32. Schwartz, H. (2000). Internationalization and two liberal welfare states: Australia and New Zealand. In F. Scharpf & V. Schmidt (Eds.), National employment and social policy in a global economy (Vol. 2, pp. 69-130). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Thornthwaite L., & Sheldon, P. (1996). The MTIA, bargaining structures and the Accord. Journal of Industrial Relations, 38, 171-195.
34. Visser, J., & Hemerijck, A. (1997). The Dutch miracle. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: University of Amsterdam Press.
35. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.