State Sovereignty and the Anti-Commandeering Cases

The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 574, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 158-172

  Adler, Matthew D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035580444     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000271620157400112     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adler, Matthew D. and Seth F. Kreimer. 1998. The New Etiquette of Federalism: New York, Printz and Yeskey. Supreme Court Review 1998:71–143.
2. Bork, Robert. 1990. The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Free Press.
3. Brest, Paul. 1980. The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding. Boston University Law Review 60:204–38.
4. Caminker, Evan H. 1995. State Sovereignty and Subordinacy: May Congress Commandeer State Officers to Implement Federal Law? Columbia Law Review 95:1001–89.
5. Caminker, Evan H. 1997. Printz, State Sovereignty, and the Limits of Formalism. Supreme Court Review 1997:199–248.
6. Choper, Jesse H. 1980. Judicial Review and the National Political Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Fallon, Richard H., Jr. 1987. A Constructivist Coherence Theory of Constitutional Interpretation. Harvard Law Review 100:1189–286.
9. Friedman, Barry. 1997. Valuing Federalism. Minnesota Law Review 82: 317–412.
10. Gardbaum, Stephen A. 1994. The Nature of Preemption. Cornell Law Review 79:767–815.
11. Grey, Thomas C. 1975. Do We Have an Unwritten Constitution? Stanford Law Review 27:703–18.
12. Hills, Roderick M., Jr. 1998. The Political Economy of Cooperative Federalism: Why State Autonomy Makes Sense and “Dual Sovereignty” Doesn't. Michigan Law Review 96:813–944.
13. Jackson, Vicki C. 1998. Federalism and the Uses and Limits of Law: Printz and Principle? Harvard Law Review 111:2180–259.
14. Komesar, Neil K 1994. Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions in Law, Economics, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Kramer, Larry D. 2000. Putting the Politics Back into the Political Safeguards of Federalism. Columbia Law Review 100:215–93.
16. McConnell, Michael W 1987. Federalism: Evaluating the Founders'Design. University of Chicago Law Review 54: 1484–512.
17. Merritt, Deborah Jones. 1988. The Guarantee Clause and State Autonomy: Federalism for a Third Century. Columbia Law Review 88:1–78.
18. Moulton, H. Geoffrey. 1999. The Quixotic Search for a Judicially Enforceable Federalism. Minnesota Law Review 83:849–925.
19. Perry, Michael J. 1982. The Constitution, the Courts and Human Rights. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Rapaczynski, Andrzej. 1985. From Sovereignty to Process: The Jurisprudence of Federalism After Garcia. Supreme Court Review 1985:341–419.
21. Richards, David A. J. 1989. Foundations of American Constitutionalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Rubin, Edward L. and Malcolm Feeley. 1994. Federalism: Some Notes on a National Neurosis. UCLA Law Review 41:903–52.
23. Sager, Lawrence Gene. 1978. Fair Measure: The Legal Status of Underenforced Constitutional Norms. Harvard Law Review 91:1212–64.
24. Shapiro, David L. 1995. Federalism: A Dialogue. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
25. Tribe, Laurence H. 2000. American Constitutional Law. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. New York: Foundation Press.
26. Wechsler, Herbert. 1954. The Political Safeguards of Federalism: The Role of the States in the Composition and Selection of the National Government. Columbia Law Review 54:543–60.
27. Yoo, John C. 1997. The Judicial Safeguards of Federalism. Southern California Law Review 70:1311–406.