Using qualitative data collection methods when planning for community forests

Journal of Arboriculture

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 139-151

  Elmendorf, William F ^a   Luloff, A E ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Community forestry; Conflict resolution; Focus groups; Key informant interviews; Planning; Sacred place mapping; Stakeholder mapping; Vision galleries

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; COMMUNITY FORESTRY; FORESTRY POLICY; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 0035570679     PISSN: 02785226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Leaders' perspectives on rural tourism: Case studies in Pennsylvania
2. Recent advances in survey collection methods and their implications for meeting rural data needs
3. The value of using multiple methods: An illustration using survey, focus group, and Delphi techniques
4. 12 steps to community development
5. Inclusive urban and community forestry programs: Using all your community's cultural resources
6. Rural community stress, distress, and well-being in Pennsylvania
7. Another look at NIPFs: Facing our 'myths'
8. Local mobilization and community growth: Toward an assessment of the 'growth machine' hypothesis
9. Environmental communication and the culture of politics of environmental citizenship
10. Community agency and disaffection: Lessons for enhancing collective resources
11. Neighborhood evaluations by city and suburban children
12. Urban residents: Views of rurality and contacts with rural places