The person-in-environment perspective in social work journals: A computer-assisted content analysis

Journal of Social Service Research

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 47-68

  Rogge, Mary E ^a,b   Cox, Mary Ellen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035566903     PISSN: 01488376     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J079v28n02_03     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Allen-Meares, P., & Lane, B.A. (1987). Grounding social work practice in theory: Ecosystems. Social Casework, 515-521.
2. Berger, R. M., & Kelly, J.J. (1993). Social work in the ecological crisis. Social Work, 38, 521-526.
3. Biblio-Link II for Windows. (1994-1995). (Version 1.1). Ann Arbor, MI: Personal Bibliographic Software, Inc.
4. Billups, J.O. (1984). Unifying social work: Importance of center-moving ideas. Social Work, 29(2), 173-180.
5. Billups, J.O., & Julia, M.C. (1987). Changing profile of social work practice: A content analysis. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 23(4), 17-22.
6. Bloom, M., & Klein, W.C. (1995). Publications and citations: A study of faculty at leading schools of social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 31(3), 377-387.
7. Brower, A.M. (1988). Can the ecological model guide social work practice? Social Service Review, 62(3), 411-429.
8. Buffum, W.E. (1988). Measuring person-environment fit in nursing homes. Journal of Social Service Research, 11(2/3), 35-54.
9. Chow, J. (1998). Differentiating urban neighborhoods: A multivariate structural model analysis. Social Work Research, 22(3), 131-142.
10. Commission on Accreditation. (1994). Handbook of accreditation standards and procedures. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
11. Cooper, S. (1977). Social work: A dissenting profession. Social Work, 22(5), 360-367.
12. Coulton, C.J. (1981). Person environment fit as the focus in health care. Social Work, 26(1), 26-35.
13. Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
14. Germain, C.B. (1973, June). An ecological perspective in casework practice. Social Casework, 323-330.
15. Germain, C.B., & Gitterman, A. (1980). The life model of social work practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
16. Germain, C.B., & Gitterman, A. (1995). Ecological perspective. In The Encyclopedia of Social Work. (19th Ed., pp. 816-824). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
17. Gibelman, M., & Schervish, P.H. (1997). Who we are: A second look. (2nd Ed.). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
18. Gitterman, A. (1996). Ecological perspective: Response to Professor Jerry Wakefield. Social Service Review, 70:3, 473-481.
19. Gordon, W.E. (1981). A natural classification system for social work literature and knowledge. Social Work. 26, 134-138.
20. Green, R.G., & Secret, M. (1996). Publishing by social work scholars in social work and non-social work journals, Social Work Research, 20(1), 31-41.
21. Hoff, M.D. (in press). Effects of global warming on human cultural diversity. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. Oxford, UK: Baldwin House, EOLSS Publishers.
22. Hoff, M.D., & McNutt, J.G. (Eds.). (1994). The global environmental crisis: Implications for social welfare and social work. Aldershot, England: Avebury Books.
23. Karls, J.M., Lowery, C.T., Mattaini, M.A., & Wandrei, K.E. (1997). The use of the PIE (Person-In-Environment) system in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 33:1, 49-58.
24. Karls, J.M, & Wandrei, K.E. (1994). Person-in-environment system: The PIE classification system for social functioning problems. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
25. Kirk, S.A, & Franke, T.M. (1997). Agreeing to disagree: A study of the reliability of manuscript reviews. Social Work Research, 21(2), 121-126.
26. Ligon, J., Thyer, B.A., & Dixon, D. (1995). Academic affiliations of those published in social work journals: A productivity analysis, 1989-1993. Journal of Social Work Education, 31(3), 369-376.
27. Meyer, C.H. (1993), Assessment in social work practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
28. Microsoft Excel 97. (1997). Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation; Microsoft Word 97. (1997). Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation.
29. Midgley, J. (1995). Social development: The development perspective in social welfare. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Monkman, M. M. (1991). Outcome objectives in social work practice: Person and environment. Social Work, 36(3), 253-258.
31. Orme, J.G., & Gillespie, D.F. (1986). Reliability and bias in categorizing individual client problems. Social Service Review, 60, 161-174.
32. Payne, A.H. (1996). Social Work Abstracts Plus. [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers. Abstracts from SilverPlatter File: Social Work Abstracts.
33. ProCite for Windows. (1995). (Version 3.1). Ann Arbor, MI: Personal Bibliographic Software, Inc.
34. QSR NUD-IST. (1995). (Version 4.0). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Qualitative Solutions & Research Pty. Ltd.
35. Rogge, M.E. (in press). Social development and the ecological tradition. Social Development Issues.
36. Rogge, M.E., & Combs-Orme, T. (in press). Protecting our future: Children, environmental policy, and social work. Social Work.
37. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (1997). Research methods for social work. (3rd Ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
38. Saari, C. (1992). The person-in-environment reconsidered: New theoretical bridges. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 9(3), 205-219.
39. Schriver, J.M. (1987). Harry Lurie's critique: Person and environment in early case-work practice, Social Service Review, 514-532.
40. SPSS for Windows. (1996). (Version 7.5.1). Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
41. Vosler, N.R., & Proctor, E.K. (1990). Stress and competence as predictors of child behavior problems. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 26(2), 3-9.
42. Wakefield, J.C. (1996a). Does social work need the eco-systems perspective? Part 1. Is the perspective clinically useful? Social Service Review, 70:1, 1-31.
43. Wakefield, J.C. (1996b). Does social work need the eco-systems perspective? Part 2. Does the perspective save social work from incoherence? Social Service Review, 70:2, 183-213.
44. Walz, T., Willenbring, G., & DeMoll, L. (1974). Environmental design. Social Work, 19(1), p. 38.
45. Weick, A. (1981). Refraining the person-in-environment perspective. Social Work, 26(2), 140-143.
46. Young, T.M. (1994). Environmental modification in clinical social work: A self-psychological perspective. Social Service Review, 68(2), 202-218.