An improved security requirement for data perturbation with implications for E-commerce

Decision Sciences

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 683-698

  Muralidhar, Krishnamurty ^a   Sarathy, Rathindra ^b   Parsa, Rahul ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DRAKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data confidentiality; Database security; E commerce; Inferential security; IS implementation; Privacy; Random data perturbation; Systems development methodologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035565671     PISSN: 00117315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00977.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Adam, N. R., & Wortmann, J. C. (1989). Security control methods for statistical databases: A comparative survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 21(4), 515-556.
2. Cavoukian, A. (1998). Data mining: Staking a claim on your privacy. Publication of the Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario, Canada, (http:// www.ipc.on.ca/english/pubpres/sum_pap/papers/datamine.htm).
3. Duncan, G. T., & Mukherjee, S. (2000). Optimal disclosure limitation strategy in statistical databases: Deterring tracker attacks through additive noise. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(3), 720-729.
4. Dutta Chowdhury, S., Duncan, G. T., Krishnan, R., Roehrig, S. F., & Mukherjee, S. (1999). Disclosure detection in multivariate categorical databases: Auditing confidentiality protection through two new matrix operators. Management Science, 45(12), 1710-1723.
5. John, D. C. (1999). Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (S. 900): A major step toward financial deregulation. The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, (http://www.heritage.org/library/backgrounder/bg1338.html), 1338.
6. Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (1992). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Jorgensen, B. (2000). A matter of trust. Electronic Business, 26(13), 119.
8. Muralidhar, K., Parsa, R., & Sarathy, R. (1999). A general additive perturbation method for database security. Management Science, 45(10), 1399-1415.
9. Palley, M. A., & Simonoff, J. S. (1987). The use of regression methodology for the compromise of confidential information in databases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 12(4), 593-608.
10. Preston, R. (February 5, 2001). It's up to e-businesses to 'get over' privacy issue (Editor's Note). InternetWeek, p. 9.
11. Simpson, G. R. (2001). Census bureau blurs data to keep names confidential. Wall Street Journal Online (http://www.wsj.com), February 14, p. B1.
12. Tendick, P. (1991). Optimal noise addition for preserving confidentiality in multivariate data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 27(2), 341-353.
13. Tendick, P., & Matloff, N. (1994). A modified random perturbation for database security. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 19(1), 47-63.