BSE - Social Psychological Aspects of a Controversial Risk;BSE -Sozialpsychologische Aspekte eines umstrittenen Risikos

Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 213-221

  Pfister, Hans Rüdiger ^a   Böhm, Gisela ^b  

^a Institut fur Wissensmedien   (Germany)

^b Ludwigsburg University of Education   (Germany)

Author keywords

BSE; Risk communication; Risk perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035565455     PISSN: 00443514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024//0044-3514.32.4.213     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Böhm, G. & Mader, S. (1998). Subjektive kausale Szenarien globaler Umweltveränderungen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 45, 270-285.
2. Böhm, G. & Pfister, H.-R. (2000). Action tendencies and characteristics of environmental risks. Acta Psychologica, 104, 317-337.
3. Böhm, G., Rost, J. & Spada, H. (1998). Psychologische Aspekte von Umweltrisiken. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 45, 243-250.
4. Eigen, M. (2001). BSE und das Prionen-Problem. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, 4(2001), 40-49.
5. Femers, S. (1993). Information über technische Risiken. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.
6. Fife-Schaw, C. & Rowe, G. (1996). Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: A psychometric study. Risk Analysis, 16, 487-500.
7. Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D. & Shepherd, R. (1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Analysis, 16, 473-486.
8. Hampel, J. & Renn, O. (Hrsg.) (1999). Gentechnik in der Öffentlichkeit. Frankfurt: Campus.
9. Holzheu, F. & Wiedemann, P. (1993). Perspektiven der Risikowahrnehmung. In Bayerische Rück (Hrsg.), Risiko ist ein Konstrukt (S. 9-19). München: Knesebeck.
10. Jungermann, H., Pfister, H.-R. & Fischer, K. (1996). Credibility, information preferences, and information interests. Risk Analysis, 16, 251-261.
11. Jungermann, H., Rohrmann, B. & Wiedemann, P. M. (Hrsg.) (1991). Risikokontroversen. Konzepte, Konflikte, Kommunikation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
13. Krohn, W. & Krücken, G. (Hrsg.) (1993). Riskante Technologien: Reflexion und Regulation. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
14. Leiss, W. (1997). Mad cows and mother's milk. New Risk Frontiers. Proceedings of SRA Europe97 (pp. 316-324). Stockholm: Center for Risk Research.
15. Marris, C., Brenot, J. & Bonnefous, S. (1997). Perceptions of BSE among the French public. New Risk Frontiers. Proceedings of SRA Europe97 (pp. 325-334). Stockholm: Center for Risk Research.
16. Miles, S. & Frewer, L. J. (2001). Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards. Food Quality and Preference, 12, 47-61.
17. Nerb, J., Spada, H. & Wahl, S. (1998). Kognition und Emotion bei der Bewertung von Umweltschadensfällen: Modellierung und Empirie. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 45, 251-269.
18. Peters, H. P. (1991). Risiko-Kommunikation: Kernenergie. In H. Jungermann, B. Rohrmann & P. Wiedemann (Hrsg.), Risikokontroversen. Konzepte, Konflikte, Kommunikation (S. 63-159). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
19. Pfister, H.-R. & Böhm, G. (2001). Decision making in the context of environmental risks. In C. M. Allwood & M. Selart (Eds.), Decision making: Social and creative dimensions (pp. 89-111). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Pfister, H.-R., Böhm, G. & Jungermann, H. (2000). The cognitive representation of genetic engineering: Knowledge and evaluations. New Genetics and Society, 19, 295-316.
21. Reilly, J. (1998). Just another food scare? Changes in the public understanding of BSE. In P. Philo (Ed.), Message received (pp. 81-95). London: Longman.
22. Renn, O. (1998). Three decades of risk research: Accomplishments and new challenges. Journal of Risk Research, 1, 49-71.
23. Renn, O. & Levine, D. (1991). Credibility and trust in risk comunication. In R. E. Kasperson & P. J. M. Stallen (Eds.), Communicating risks to the public. International perspectives (pp. 175-218). Kluwer: Dordrecht.
24. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
25. Slovic, P. (1992). Perceptions of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In S. Golding & S. Krimsky (Eds.), Theories of risk (pp. 117-152). London: Praeger.
26. Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19, 689-701.
27. Slovic, P., Flynn, J. & Layman, M. (1991). Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science, 254, 1603-1607.
28. Sparks, P. & Shepherd, R. (1994). Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 14, 799-806.
29. Spiegel Online (2000). Die Chronologie der BSE-Krise. http://www.spiegel.de/politik/europa/0.1518.105210 .00.html (Zugriff 19.04.2001).
30. Van der Pligt, J. (1992). Nuclear energy and the public. Oxford: Blackwell.
31. Weinstein, N. D. (1987). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 481-500.