Severity of illness versus expected benefit in societal evaluation of healthcare interventions

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 85-92

  Nord, Erik ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness; Fairness; Multiattribute utility instrument; Outcome evaluation; Person trade off; Priority setting; QALY; Resource allocation; Severity; Utility

Indexed keywords

CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PROGRAM; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; REVIEW; SOCIETY; WELLBEING;

EID: 0035556554     PISSN: 14737167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14737167.1.1.85     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health analysis and medical practice
2. The trade-off between severity of illness and treatment effect in cost-value analysis of healthcare
3. Ethics and efficiency in the provision of healthcare
4. Priority to the worse off in healthcare resource prioritisation
5. Quality of life in chronic diseases: Perceptions of elderly patients
6. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions
7. Do nonpatients underestimate the quality of life associated with chronic health conditions because of a focusing illusion?
8. Cost value analysis in healthcare
9. Multi-attribute health status classification systems
10. A fifteen-dimensional measure of health-related quality of life (15 D) and its applications
11. EuroQol: The current state of play
12. Choices in healthcare
13. Justice and the right to healthcare
14. No easy choices - The difficulties of healthcare
15. Helsepolitikere ønsker ikke mest mulig helse per krone
16. How stable are people's preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients?
17. Measuring preferences over the distribution of health benefits
18. The validity of a visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health states
19. Seminarserie om veiledende verditall for prioritering i helsevesenet
20. Veiledende verditall for tallfesting av nytte i nytte-kostnadsanalyser av helsetjenester
21. The person trade-off approach to valuing healthcare programs
22. Toward cost value analysis in healthcare'?
23. Public preferences for prevention versus cure: What if one ounce of prevention is worth only an ounce of cure?
24. A scale of valuations of states of illness: Is there a social consensus?
25. Individual utilities are inconsistent with rationing choices
26. Critique and some recent contributions to the theory of cost utility analysis
27. Using the person trade-off approach to examine differences between individual and social values
28. The measurement of individual utility and social welfare
29. Social evaluation of healthcare versus personal evaluation of health states: Evidence on the validity of four health state scaling instruments using Norwegian and Australian surveys
30. The Oregon experience: Scales, numbers and their meaning
31. Is the person trade-off a valid method for allocating healthcare resources?
32. Choices, values and frames
33. Preference for equity as a framing effect
34. Distributive justice and the use of summary measures of population health status
35. Health status index models for use in resource allocation decisions. A critical review in the light of observed preferences for social choice
36. Intergenerational equity: An exploration of the 'fair innings' argument
37. Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes
38. Health state values from multiattribute utility instruments need correction