Mass imprisonment and the family: A legal perspective

Marriage and Family Review

Volumn 32, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 63-82

  Rosen, David M ^a  

^a FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conjugal visitation; Family law; Incarceration; Mass imprisonment; Prison; Prisoners

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035555484     PISSN: 01494929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J002v32n03_05     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bagley v. Bagley, 57 Misc. 2d 388 (New York, 1968).
2. Block v. Rutherford, 468 U.S. 576 (1984).
3. Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971).
4. Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1979).
5. Carlson, B.E. & Cervera, N. (1992). Inmates and their wives: Incarceration and family life. Westport, CN: Greenwood.
6. Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Conley, J.M. & O'Barr, W. M. (1998). Just words: Law, language, and power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8. Doe v. Coughlin, 71 N.Y. 2d 200 (New York 1987).
9. Farrington, D.P., Barnes, G. C. & Lambert, S. (1996). The familial transmission of criminality. Psychology 1, 47-63.
10. Fishman, L.T. (1990). Women at the wall: A study of prisoner's wives doing time on the outside. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
11. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.
12. Foucault, M. (1982). Archeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
13. Friedman, L. M. (1993). Crime and punishment in American history. New York: Basic Books.
14. Froehlich v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 196 F. 3rd 800 (7th Cir. 1999).
15. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. New York: Doubleday.
16. Gonnerman, J. (1999, May 19-25). The supermax solution. Village Voice, pp. 1, 23-29.
17. Gonnerman, J. (2000, Febr 9-15). The miseducation of Elaine Bartlett. Village Voice, pp. 48-56.
18. Greenholtz v. Nebraska Penal Inmates, 442 U.S. 1 (1977).
19. Hairston, C.F. (1988). Family ties during imprisonment: Do they influence criminal activity? Federal Probation 57 (4), 41-47.
20. Hairston, C.F. (1991). Family ties during imprisonment: Important to whom and for what? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 18, 87-102.
21. Hampsey v. Hampsey, 149 Misc. 2d 606 (New York, 1991).
22. Hopper, C. (1969). Sex in prison: The Mississippi experiment with conjugal visiting. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
23. Human Rights Watch. (1998). No where to hide: Retaliation against women in Michigan state prisons. Available: http//www.hrw.org/reports98/women [1999].
24. Human Rights Watch. Red Onion State Prison: Super-maximum security confinement in Virginia. Available: http://www.hrw.org/report/1999/redonion [1999].
25. In the Matter of Donald C. v. Michelle T., 679 N.Y.S. 2d 290 (New York, 1998).
26. In the Matter of David v. Davis, 232 A.D. 2d 773 (New York, 1996).
27. In the Matter of Griffin, 88 N.Y. 2d 674 (1996).
28. In the Matter of Mohammed v. Cortland County Dept. of Social Services, 186 A.D. 2d 908 (New York, 1992).
29. In the Matter of Thomas M. Rogowski, 251 A.D. 2d 827 (1998).
30. John R. v. Marlene C., 179 Misc. 2d 72 (New York, 1998).
31. Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Union, 433 U.S. 199 (1977).
32. Justice Council Committee on Corrections. (1998). Maintaining family contact when a family member goes to prison: An examination of state policies on mail, visiting, and telephone access. Tallahassee, FL: Author.
33. Kentucky Dept. of Corrections v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454 (1989).
34. Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967).
35. In the Matter of D.J. v. R.J., 133 Misc. 2d 883 (New York, 1986).
36. In the Matter of Mary of Oakknoll v. Coughlin, 101 A.D. 2d 931 (New York, 1984).
37. Note. (1974).Conjugal visitation rights and the appropriate standard of judicial review for prison regulations. Michigan Law Review, 73, 398-415.
38. Nunn v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, No. 96-CV 71416 DT (E.D. Mich., 1996).
39. Price v. Johnston, 334 U.S. 266 (1948).
40. In the Matter of Luis Vaquez, 238 A.D. 2d 631 (New York, 1997).
41. O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342 (1977).
42. Owen, B. (1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a women's prison. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
43. Payne v. Superior Court of Los Angeles, 17 Cal. 3rd 908 (1976).
44. Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817 (1974).
45. Rowe, D. C. & Farrington, D. P. (1977). The familial transmission of criminal convictions. Criminology. 35 (1), 177-201.
46. Schuelke, S. C. (1998). Prison visitation and family values. Michigan Bar Journal 77, 160-164.
47. Scott C. v. Marrietta C., 156 Misc. 2d 336 (New York, 1992).
48. Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987).
49. TVNightmarish Alabama jail conditions not enough to block man's extradition. (1998, March 6). Lawyer's Weekly 17 (40), 1-2.
50. Vann v. Vann, 205 A.D. 2d 897 (New York, 1994).
51. Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990).
52. Watterson, K. (1996). Women in prison: Inside the concrete womb (Rev. ed.). Boston: Northeastern University.
53. Wolff v. McDonnel, 418 U.S. 539 (1974).