The relationship between communication attitude and emotion of children who stutter

Journal of Fluency Disorders

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-15

  Vanryckeghem, Martine ^a   Hylebos, Carl ^b   Brutten, Gene ^a   Peleman, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b KH voor Gezondheidszorg at Gent   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Attitude; Communication Attitude Test; Emotion

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CHILD; EMOTION; EMOTIONALITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELATIVE; SPEECH; STUTTERING;

EID: 0035548848     PISSN: 0094730X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0094-730X(00)00090-5     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Andrews G., Cutler J. Stuttering therapy: the relation between changes in symptom level and attitudes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 39:1974;312-319.
2. Bakker K. Normering `vragenlijst voor spreeksituaties' (Brutten). Logopedie en Foniatrie. 52:1980;520-526.
3. Bakker K. Two supplemental scoring procedures for diagnostic evaluations with the Speech Situation Checklist. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 20:1995;117-126.
4. Bakker, K., & Brutten, G. (1982). The Speech Situation Checklist as a discriminative procedure. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association Convention, Washington, DC.
5. Bakker K., Brutten G. Stutterer or nonstutterer: a discriminative aid to differential diagnosis. Logopedie en Foniatrie. 56:1984;13-15.
6. Bloodstein O. A handbook on stuttering. 1995;Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA.
7. Boutsen, F., & Brutten, G. (1990). Stutterers and nonstutterers: a normative investigation of children's speech-associated attitudes. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association Convention.
8. Brutten G. Behaviour assessment and the strategy of therapy. Lebrun Y., Hoops R. Neurolinguistic approaches to stuttering. 1973;8-17 Mouton, The Hague.
9. Brutten G. Stuttering: topography, assessment and behavior change strategies. Eisenson J. Stuttering: a second symposium. 1975;199-262 Harper & Row, New York.
10. Brutten G. The Speech Situation Checklist. Comments on its use as a measure of severity. Logopedie en Foniatrie. 52:1981;472-476.
11. Brutten, G. (1982). The Speech Situation Checklist for Children: a discriminant analysis. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association convention, Washington, DC.
12. Brutten G. Behavior Assessment Battery-Revised. 1997;University of Central Florida, Orlando.
13. Brutten G., Dunham S. The Communication Attitude Test: a normative study of grade school children. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 14:1989;371-377.
14. Brutten G., Janssen P. A normative and factor analysis study of the responses of Dutch and American stutterers to the Speech Situation Checklist. Proceedings of the 18th. Congress International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrists, Washington, DC:1981;281-286.
15. Brutten G., Shoemaker D. The modification of stuttering. 1967;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NY.
16. Cooper E. Fluency disorders. Crowe T.A. Applications of counseling in speech-language pathology and audiology. 1997;145-166 Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
17. DeKort, C. (1997). Validity measures of the Communication Attitude Test. Master's thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
18. De Nil L., Brutten G. Stutterers and nonstutterers: a preliminary investigation of children's speech-associated attitudes. Tijfdschrift voor Logopedie en Audiologie. 16:1986;85-92.
19. De Nil L., Brutten G. Speech-associated attitudes. Stuttering, voice disordered, articulation disordered and normal speaking children. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 15:1990;127-134.
20. De Nil L., Brutten G. Speech-associated attitudes of stuttering and nonstuttering children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 34:1991;60-66.
21. De Nil, L., Brutten, G., & Claeys, M. (1985, November). Stutterers and nonstutterers: a normative investigation of children's speech-associated attitudes. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association Convention, Washington, DC.
22. Erickson R. Assessing communication attitudes among stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 12:1969;711-724.
23. Ezrati, R. (1998). The Hebrew version of the Communication Attitude Test. Unpublished manuscript, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
24. Guitar B. Pretreatment factors associated with the outcome of stuttering therapy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 19:1976;590-600.
25. Guitar B. Stuttering: an integrated approach to its nature and treatment. 2nd ed. 1998;Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
26. Healey, C. (1999). A multidimensional approach to the diagnosis and treatment of stuttering. Workshop presented at the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association convention, San Francisco, CA.
27. Liebert R., Liebert L. Science and behavior. 4th ed. 1995;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
28. Logan K., Yaruss S. Helping parents address attitudinal and emotional factors with young children who stutter. Contemporary Issues in Communication Sciences and Disorders. 25:1999;69-81.
29. Manning W. Clinical decision making in the diagnosis and treatment of fluency disorders. 1996;Delmar Publishers, Albany, NY.
30. Nagasawa T., Kawai N. A study of attitude change of stuttering children. Bulletin of the Faculty of School Education, Hiroshima University. 20:1998;97-108.
31. Riley G. A Stuttering Severity Instrument for use with children and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 37:1972;314-322.
32. Shumak I. A speech-situation rating sheet for stutterers. Johnson W., Leutenegger R. Stuttering in children and adults. 1955;341-347 University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
33. Starkweather C.W. A multiprocess behavioral approach to stuttering therapy. Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing. 1:1980;327-337.
34. Trotter, A. (1982). A normative study of the Speech Situation Checklist for children. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association Convention, Washington, DC.
35. Trotter, A. (1983). A normative study of the Speech Situation Checklist for children. Master's thesis, San Diego State University.
36. Vanryckeghem, M. (1994). The Communication Attitude Test: an investigation of stuttering and nonstuttering children and their parents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL.
37. Vanryckeghem M. De Communication Attitude Test. Gedragstherapie. 30:1997;47-52.
38. Vanryckeghem M. De Communication Attitude Test en het verband met de ernst van het stotteren. Bepaald via het percentage niet-vloeiendheid en een beoordelingsschaal. Signaal. 19:1997;2-10.
39. Vanryckeghem M. The Behavior Assessment Battery: an update on its questionnaires. Proceedings from the 24th. Congress International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics:1998;754-756 Nijmegen University Press, Amsterdam.
40. Vanryckeghem M., Brutten G. The Communication Attitude Test: a reliability investigation. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 3:1992;177-190.
41. Vanryckeghem, M. & Brutten, G. (1992). The Communication Attitude Test: a repeated measures reliability investigation of nonstutterers. Unpublished manuscript, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL.
42. Vanryckeghem M., Brutten G. The relationship between communication attitude and fluency failure of stuttering and nonstuttering children. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 21:1996;109-118.
43. Vanryckeghem M., Brutten G. The speech-associated attitude of children who do and do not stutter and the differential effect of age. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 6:1997;67-73.
44. Webster L.M., Brutten G. The modification of stuttering and associated behaviors. Dickson S. Communication disorders. Remedial principles and practices. 1974;194-237 Scott Foresman & Company, Glenview, IL.