The self-description questionnaire ii and gifted students: Another look at Plucker, Taylor, Callahan, and Tomchin's (1997) "mirror, mirror on the wall"

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 976-996

  Marsh, Herbert W ^a   Plucker, Jonathan A ^a   Stocking, Vicki B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035541538     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00131640121971608     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
2. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
3. Boyle, G. J. (1994). Self-Description Questionnaire II: A review. Test Critiques, 10, 632-643.
4. Brown, R. L. (1994). Efficiency of the indirect approach for estimating structural equation model with missing data: A comparison of five methods. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 287-316.
5. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & R. Stine (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Byrne, B. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Cornell, D. G. (1994). Barriers to research in gifted education. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development (Vol. 2, pp. 173-193). Dayton: Ohio Psychology.
9. Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Print, M. (2000). Selective, streamed and mixed-ability programs for gifted students: Impact on self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Australian Journal of Education, 44, 51-15.
10. Graham, J. W., & Hoffer, S. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnable, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201-218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Hoge, R. D., & Renzulli, J. S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63, 449-465.
13. Janos, P. M., & Robinson, N. M. (1985). The performance of students in a program of radical acceleration at the university level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 175-179.
14. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
15. Little, R.J.A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley.
16. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., & Swiatek, M. A. (1999). Elementary student talent searches: Establishing appropriate guidelines for qualifying test scores. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 265-272.
17. Marsh, H. W. (1988). Self Description Questionnaire: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test manual and a research monograph. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
18. Marsh, H. W. (1990a). A multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77-172.
19. Marsh, H. W.(1990b).Self Description Questionneire (SDQ)II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. (Republished in 1992, Publication Unit, Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney, Macarthur.)
20. Marsh, H. W. (1993). Academic self-concept: Theory measurement and research. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 59-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Marsh, H. W. (1994a). Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 5-34.
22. Marsh, H. W. (1994b). Using the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988 to evaluate theoretical models of self-concept: The Self-Description Questionnaire. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 439-456.
23. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315-353). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness of fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
25. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. (1988). A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366-380.
26. Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R. G., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285-319.
27. Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In G. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 131-198). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
28. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). The application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor structures and their invariance across age groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
29. Marsh, H. W., & O'Niell, R. (1984). Self Description Questionnaire III (SDQ III): The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late-adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153-174.
30. Marsh, H. W., Parker, J., & Barnes, J (1985). Multidimensional adolescent self-concepts: Their relationship to age, sex and academic measures. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 422-444.
31. Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998). Research evidence regarding the validity and effects of talent search educational programs. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 134-138.
33. Plucker, J. A., Taylor, J. W., Callahan, C. M., & Tomchin, E. M. (1997). Mirror, mirror, on the wall: Reliability and validity evidence for the Self Description Questionnaire-II with gifted students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 704-713.
34. Pyryt, M. C., & Mendaglio, S. (1994). The multidimensional self-concept: A comparison of gifted and average-ability adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 299-305.
35. Ross, A., & Parker, M. (1980). Academic and social self concepts of the academically gifted. Exceptional Children, 47, 6-11.
36. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
38. SPSS. (1999). SPSS for Windows (Release 10.0.5). Chicago: Author.
39. Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multigroup modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnable, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201-218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Wylie, R. C. (1989). Measures of self-concept. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.