Opportunities for improving consumer research through latent variable structural equation modeling

Journal of Consumer Research

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 159-166

  MacKenzie, Scott B ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035540395     PISSN: 00935301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/321954     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Bagozzi, Richard P. (1980), Causal Models in Marketing, New York: Wiley.
2. Bollen, Kenneth A. and Richard Lennox (1991), "Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective," Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305-314.
3. Brown, Roger L. (1997), "Assessing Specific Mediational Effects in Complex Theoretical Models," Structural Equation Modeling, 4 (2), 142-156.
4. Browne, Michael W. and Robert Cudeck (1993), "Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit," in Testing Structural Equation Models, ed. Kenneth A. Bollen and J. Scott Long, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Cook, Thomas D. and Donald T. Campbell (1979), Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Cote, Joseph A. and M. Ronald Buckley (1987), "Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing across 70 Construct Validation Studies," Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (August), 315-318.
7. _ and M. Ronald Buckley (1988), "Measurement Error and Theory Testing in Consumer Research: An Illustration of the Importance of Construct Validation," Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (March), 579-582.
8. Duncan, Terry E. and Susan C. Duncan (1995), "Modeling the Processes of Development via Latent Variable Growth Curve Methodology," Structural Equation Modeling, 2 (3), 187-213.
9. Hu, Li-tze and Peter M. Bentler (1999), "Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives," Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55.
10. Kaplan, David and Pamela R. Elliott (1997), "A Didactic Example of Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling Applicable to the Study of Organizations," Structural Equation Modeling, 4 (1), 1-24.
11. Klein, Katherine J. and Steve W. J. Kozlowski (2000), Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations: Foundations Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. MacKenzie, Scott B., Richard J. Lutz, and George E. Belch (1986), "The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations," Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (May), 130-143.
13. _ and Richard A. Spreng (1992), "How Does Motivation Moderate the Impact of Central and Peripheral Processing on Brand Attitudes and Intentions?" Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (March), 519-529.
14. Perdue, Barbara C. and John O. Summers (1986), "Checking the Success of Manipulations in Marketing Experiments," Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (November), 317-326.
15. Peterson, Robert A., Gerald Albaum, and Richard F. Beltramini (1985), "A Meta-Analysis of Effect Sizes in Consumer Behavior Experiments," Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (June), 97-103.
16. Sawyer, Alan G., John G. Lynch, Jr., and David L. Brinberg (1995), "A Bayesian Analysis of the Information Value of Manipulation and Confounding Checks in Theory Tests," Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (March), 581-595.
17. Schumacker, Randall E. and George A. Marcoulides (1998), Interaction and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Modeling, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M. and Hans Baumgartner (1998), "Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (June), 78-90.