Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of ICANN’s Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy

Information Society

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 151-163

  Mueller, Milton ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative Dispute Resolution Globalization; Icann; Internet Domain Names; Policy Wipo; Trademark; Uniform Dispute Resolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035539246     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972240119769     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. http://www.icann.org/nsi/icann-raa-04nov99.htm
2. ICANN, Statistical Summary of Proceedings under the Uniform Dispute Resolution policy, http://www.icann.org./udrp/proceedings-stat.htm
3. J Crew International v. crew.com, WIPO proceeding number D2000-0054, decided April 20, 2000, http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/ decisions/html/d2000-0054.html. The decision was by a three-person panel with one dissent.
4. Diageo plc v. Cupcake Patrol, WIPO proceeding number D2000-0996, decided October 22, 2000, http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/ decisions/html/d2000-0996.html
5. Quirk Nissan v. Maccini, NAF proceedings FA0094959 and FA 0094963, http://www.arbforum.com/domains/decisions/94959.htm
6. http://www.arbforum.com/domains/decisions/94963.htm, decided June 29, 2000.
7. Quirk Nissan v. Maccini, NAF proceeding FA0094964, decided June 29, 2000, http://www.arbforum.com/domains/decisions/94959. htm
8. Mueller, Milton. 1999b. ICANN and Internet governance: Sorting through the debris of “self-regulation.” Info 1(6):477-500.
9. Nathenson, Ira S. 1997. Showdown atthe domain name corral: Property rights and personal jurisdiction over squatters, poachers, and other parasites. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 58:991.
10. Oppedahl, Carl. 1997. Remedies in domain name lawsuits: How is a domain name like a cow? John Marshall Journal of Computer &Information Law 15:437.
11. Quittner, Joshua. 1994. Billions registered: Right now, there are no rules to keep you from owning a bitchin’ corporate name as your own Internet address. Wired 2(7).
12. Rony, Ellen, and Rony, Peter. 1998. The domain name handbook. Lawrence, KS: R&D.
13. U.S. Department of Commerce, NTIA. 1998. Management of Internet names and addresses. Federal Register 63:31741.
14. World Intellectual Property Organization. 1998. The management of Internet names and addresses: Intellectual property issues. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
15. World Intellectual Property Organization. 2000. Second WIPO Internet Domain Name Process. Geneva, www.wipo.int/processz/
16. Burk, Dan L. 1995. Trademarks along the Infobahn: A first look at the emerging law of cybermarks. Richmond Journal of Law &Technology 1:1-20.
17. Froomkin, A. Michael. 2000. Semi-private international rulemaking: Lessons learned from the WIPO domain name process. In Regulating the global information society, ed. Christopher T. Marsden, pp. 211-232. London: Routledge.
18. International Trademark Association. 1997. INTA white paper: Trademarks on the Internet. New York: International Trademark Association.
19. Lemley, Mark. 1999. The modern Lanham Act and the death of common sense. Yale Law Journal 108:1687.
20. Mueller, Milton. 1999a. Trademarks and domain names: Property rights and institutional evolution in cyberspace. In Selected papers from the 1998 Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, eds. S. Gillett and I. Vogelsang, pp. 51-69. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.