A higher order analysis of the factor structure of the Myers-Briggs type indicator

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 96-108

  Johnson, William L ^a,e   Mauzey, Edward ^b   Johnson, Annabel M ^e   Murphy, Stanley D ^c   Zimmerman, Kurt J ^d  

^a Secdry Special Education Department   (United States)

^b SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Marshall County High School   (United States)

^d The Coca Cola Company   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035537529     PISSN: 07481756     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07481756.2001.12069026     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
2. Auerbach, E. (1992, January 6). Not your type, but right for the job [Editorial]. The Wall Street Journal, p. 11.
3. Briggs, K. C., & Myers, I. B. (1987). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator-Form G. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
4. Carlson, J. (1985). Recent assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator-Form G. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 356-365.
5. Carlson, J. (1989a). Affirmative: Insupport of researching the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 484-486.
6. Carlson, J. (1989b). Rebuttal: The MBTI: Not ready for routine use in counseling. A reply. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 489.
7. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavior Research, 1, 140-161.
8. Conoley, J., & Kramer, J. (1989). The tenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
9. Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 57, 17-40.
10. Daniel, L. G. (1991). Operationalization of a frame of reference for studying organizational culture in middle schools. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in educational research: Substantive findings. methodological developments (pp. 1-24). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
11. Drummond, R. (1992). Appraisal procedures for counselors and helping professionals. New York: Macmillan.
12. Fabrigar, L. R., MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
13. Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.
14. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.
16. Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19,149-161.
17. Hakstian, A. R., Rogers, W. D., & Cattell, R. B. (1982). The behavior of numbers factors rules with simulated data. Multivariale Behavioral Research, 17, 193-219.
18. Harvey, R., Muny, W., & Stamoulis, D. (1995). Unresolved issues in the dimensionality of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 535-544.
19. Healy, C. (1989a). Negative: The MBTI: Not ready for routine use in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 487-488.
20. Healy, C. (1989b). Rebuttal: In response to Professor Carlson. Journal of Counseling and Development. 67, 490.
21. Johnson, D., & Saunders, D. (1990). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator-Expanded report. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 561-570.
22. Johnson, W. L., Johnson, A. B., Murphy, S. D., Weiss, A., & Zimmerman, K. (1998). A third-order component analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 820-831.
23. Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological Types. In R. F. C. Hull (Ed.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (Vol. 6, pp. 510-523). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1921)
24. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variable models (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. McCarley, N., & Carskadon, T. (1983). Test-retest reliabilities of scales and subscales of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and of criteria for clinical interpretive hypotheses involving them. Research in Psychological Type, 6, 24-26.
26. McCaulley, M. H. (1981). Jung's theory of psychological types and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In P. McReynolds (Ed.), Advances in personality assessment. (Vol. 5, pp. 294-352). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. McCaulley, M. H. (1990). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A measure for individuals and groups. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 181-195.
28. Murray, J. (1990). Review of research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Perception and Motor Skills. 70, 1187-1202.
29. Myers, P. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists.
30. Pittenger, D. (1993). The utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Review of Educational Research, 63, 467-488.
31. SAS Institute, Inc. (1986). SAS user's guide: Statistics, statistical analysis system. Cary, NC: Author.
32. Schiflett, S. (1989). Validity evidence for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a measure of hemisphere dominance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 741-745.
33. Sipps, G., & Alexander, R. (1987). The multifactorial nature of extraversion-introversion in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Eysenck Personality Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 543-552.
34. Sipps, G., Alexander, R., & Friedt, L. (1985). Item analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 789-796.
35. Sipps, G., & DiCauldo, J. (1988). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a measure of sociability and impulsivity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 445-451.
36. Stevens, J. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Stricker, L., & Ross, J. (1964). An assessment of some structural properties of the Jungian personality typology. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 62-71.
38. Thompson, B. (1990). SECONDOR: A program that computes a second-order principal-components analysis and various interpretation aids. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 575-580.
39. Thompson, B., & Borrello, G. (1986a). Construct validity of the Mycrs-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 745-752.
40. Thompson, B., & Borrello, G. (1986b). Second-order factor structure of the MBTI: A construct validity assessment. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 18, 148-153.
41. Tzeng, O., Outcalt, D., Boyer, S., Ware, R., & Landis, D. (1984). Item validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 255-256.
42. Tzeng, O., Ware, R., & Bharadwaj, N. (1991). Comparison between bipolar and unipolar ratings of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 681 -690.
43. Weiss, D., Mendelsohn, G., & Feimer, N. (1982). Reply to the comments of Block and Ozer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1182-1189.
44. Widaman, K. F. (1993). Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 263-311.