Toward a sociogenetic solution: Examining language formation processes through SWARM modeling

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 281-295

  Satterfield, Teresa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Language acquisition; Language contact; Pidgins and creoles

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035535548     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089443930101900304     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Albin, P., & Foley, D. K. (1990). Decentralized, dispersed exchange without an auctioneer: A simulation study. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18(1), 27-51.
2. Arends, J. (1995). Demographic factors in the formation of Sranan. In J. Arends (Ed.), The early stages of creolization (pp. 233-285). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Arends, J., Muysken, P., & Smith, N. (Eds.). (1994). Pidgins and creoles: An introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Axelrod, R. (1993). A model of the emergence of new political actors (Working Paper 93-11-068). Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe Institute.
5. Axelrod, R. (1995). The convergence and stability of cultures: Local convergence and global polarization (Working Paper 95-03-028). Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe Institute.
6. Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 212-218.
7. Bickerton, D. (1988). Creole languages and the bioprogram. In F. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey (pp. 267-284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bickerton, D. (1992). The sociohistorical matrix of creolization. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 7, 307-318.
9. Bickerton, D. (1999). How to acquire language without positive evidence: What acquisitionists can learn from creoles. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change (pp. 49-74). Cambridge: MIT Press.
10. Briscoe, T. (2000). Grammatical acquisition: Inductive bias and coevolution of language and the language acquisition device. Language, 76(2), 245-296.
11. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris.
12. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
13. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14. Epstein, J., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies. Cambridge: MIT Press/Brookings Institution.
15. Gumperz, J. (1971). Language in social groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Kirby, S. (1998). Fitness and the selective adaptation of language. In J. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & C. Knight (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language (pp. 359-383). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Migge, B. (2000). The origin of the syntax and semantics of property items in Surinamese plantation creole. In J. McWhorter (Ed.), Language change and language contact in pidgins and creoles (pp. 201-234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Satterfield, T. (1999). Bilingual selection of syntactic knowledge. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
20. Schelling, T. (1969). Models of segregation. American Economic Review, 59(2), 488-493.
21. Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143-186.
22. Sebba, M. (1998). Contact languages: Pidgins and creoles. New York: St. Martin's.
23. Siegel, J. (1987). Language contact in a plantation environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Thomason, S. (1997). A typology of contact languages. In A. Spears & D. Winford (Eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles (pp. 71-88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Thomason, S., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley University of California Press.