Simulation of the learning of norms

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 296-306

  Verhagen, Harko ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Computer simulation; Learning; Norms

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035535542     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089443930101900305     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Boman, M. (1999). Norms in artificial decision making. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 7(1), 17-35.
2. Briggs, W., & Cook, D. (1995). Flexible social laws. In T. Dean (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1995 International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 688-693). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
3. Carley, K. M., & Gasser, L. (1999). Computational organization theory. In G. Weiss (Ed.), Multiagent systems - A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 299-330). Boston: MIT Press.
4. Conte, R., & Castelfranchi, C. (1995). Cognitive and social action. London: University College London Press.
5. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C., & Dignum, F. (1999). Autonomous norm-acceptance. In J. P. Müller, M. P. Singh, & A. S. Rao (Eds.), Intelligent agents V: Agent theories, architectures, and languages (pp. 99-112). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
6. Conte, R., Falcone, R., & Sartor, G. (1999). Introduction: agents and norms: How to fill the gap? Artificial Intelligence and Law, 7(1), 1-15.
7. Gasser, L. (1991). Social conceptions of knowledge and action: DAI foundations and open systems semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 47(1-3), 107-138.
8. Gilbert, M. (1989). On social facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Gilbert, M. (1996). Living together: Rationality, sociality and obligation. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
10. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon.
11. Mali, A. D. (1996). Social laws for agent modeling. In M Tambe & P. Gmytrasiewicz (Eds.), Agent modeling: Papers from the AAAI Workshop (pp. 53-60). Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
12. Ossowski, S. (1999). Co-ordination in artificial agent societies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13. Saam, N. J., & Harrer, A. (1999). Simulating norms, social inequality, and functional change in artificial societies. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation [Online], 2(1). Available: http://www.soc. surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/2/1/2.html
14. Shoham, Y., & Tennenholtz, M. (1992). On the synthesis of useful social laws for artificial agent societies (preliminary report). In Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 276-281). Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
15. Shoham, Y., & Tennenholtz, M. (1997). On the emergence of social conventions: Modeling, analysis, and simulations. Artificial Intelligence, 94(1-2), 139-166.
16. Tuomela, R. (1995). The importance of us: A philosophical study of basic social norms. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Ullman-Margalit, E. (1977). The emergence of norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Verhagen, H.J.E. (2000). Norm autonomous agents. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Department of System and Computer Sciences, the Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University, Sweden.
19. Verhagen, H.J.E., & Smit, R. A. (1997). Multiagent systems as simulation tools for social theory testing. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Simulation and the Social Sciences (ICCS&SS) Siena, available as part of Verhagen, H. (1998). Agents and sociality. Unpublished philosophiae licentiate (PhL) thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
20. Verhagen, H.J.E., & Smit, R. A. (1997). Multiagent systems as simulation tools for social theory testing. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Simulation and the Social Sciences (ICCS&SS) Siena, available as part of Verhagen, H. (1998). Agents and sociality. Unpublished philosophiae licentiate (PhL) thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.