Monopoles and dyons in SO(3) gauged Skyrme models

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 3270-3281

  Brihaye, Y ^a   Hartmann, B ^b   Tchrakian, D H ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONS   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^d DUBLIN INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035535297     PISSN: 00222488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1380253     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. T. H. R. Skyrme, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 260, 127 (1961); Nucl. Phys. 31, 556 (1962).
2. T. H. R. Skyrme, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 260, 127 (1961); Nucl. Phys. 31, 556 (1962).
3. E. D'Hoker and E. Farhi, Nucl. Phys. B 241, 109 (1984).
4. Y. Brihaye and D. H. Tchrakian, Nonlinearity 11, 891 (1998).
5. B. Kleihaus, D. H. Tchrakian, and F. Zimmerschied, J. Math. Phys. 41, 816 (2000).
6. K. Arthur and D. H. Tchrakian, Phys. Lett. B 352, 327 (1995).
7. V. B. Kopeliovich and B. E. Shtern, JETP Lett. 45, 203 (1987).
8. B. Kleihaus, D. O'Keeffe, and D. H. Tchrakian, Nucl. Phys. B 536, 381 (1998).
9. B. Julia and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2227 (1975).
10. Y. Brihaye, B. Kleihaus, and D. H. Tchrakian, J. Math. Phys. 40, 1136 (1999).
11. B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, and D. H. Tchrakian, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13, 2523 (1988).
12. Note that in Refs. 3 and 4, unlike here, an explicit potential was not employed. This is because there, only one value, ω = 0, was used so it was considered reasonable to treat the role of the corresponding potential in a putative capacity. This is justified since, as we have verified here too, the explicit use of a potential only affects the asyptotics of the chiral function f(r) and otherwise leads to no qualitative differences.
13. E. Braaten, S. Townsend, and L. Carson, Phys. Lett. B 235, 147 (1990).
14. R. Battye and P. Sutcliffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 363 (1997).