Constructing difference: A comparative study of elementary science curriculum differentiation

Science Education

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 239-262

  Hayes, Michael T ^a   Deyhle, Donna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035532541     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.1008     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum and Inquiry, 11, 3-41.
2. Apple, M. (1981). Ideology and curriculum. Great Britain: Routledge.
3. Apple, M. (1998). Mechanisms of differentiation: A response to Roth & McGinn. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 423-426.
4. Barba, R. H. (1993). A study of culturally syntonic variables in the bilingual/bicultural program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1053-1070.
5. Bernstein, B. (1977). Social class, language and socialization. In J. Karabel & A. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 511-534). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Beyer, L. E. (1983). Aesthetic curriculum and cultural reproduction. In M. Apple & L. Weis (Eds.), Ideology and practice in schooling (pp. 32-56). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publications.
8. Bowles, H., & Gintis, S. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.
9. Calabrese-Barton, A. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 379-394.
10. Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 243-258.
11. Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman Educational Books.
12. Connell, R. W., Ashendon, D. J., Kessler, S., & Dowset, G. W. (1982). Making the difference. Sydney, Australia: George Allen & Unwin.
13. Contreras, A., & Lee, O. (1990). Differential treatment of students by middle school science teachers: Unintended bias. Science Education, 74, 433-444.
14. Delpit, L. (1988). Silenced dialogue. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280-294.
15. Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
16. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1994). Students' conceptions and constructivist teaching methods. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walbert (Eds.), Improving science education (pp. 1-13). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201-226). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1995). Part 1: Science content and constructivist views of learning and teaching. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walbert (Eds.), Improving science education (pp. 1-13). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York: Random House.
20. Gabel, D. (1994). Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
21. Gee, J. P., Michaels, S., & O'Connor, C. (1992). Discourse analysis. In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201-226). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Gilbert, A., & Yerrick, R. (1999). Unheard struggles: Casting new light on cultural, curricular and tracking issues in rural science classrooms. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching meetings, Boston, MA, March 24-31.
23. Hammond, L. (1999). The Southeast Asian garden: Incorporating community knowledge in an elementary school science curriculum. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching meetings, Boston, MA, March, 24-31.
24. Keddie, N. E. (1972). The social basis of classroom knowledge. In M. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control (pp. 133-157). London: Methuen.
25. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
26. Lesko, N. (1991). Curriculum differentiation as social redemption: The case of school-aged mothers. In R. Page & L. Valli (Eds.), Curriculum differentiation (pp. 113-136). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
27. Meyer, K. J., Stewart, J., & England, R. E. (1989). Race, class and education. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
28. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.
29. Mulkey, L. M., & Ellis, R. (1990). Social stratification and science education: A longitudinal analysis, 1981-1986, of minorities' integration into the science pool. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 205-217.
30. National Center for Educational Statistics (1992). Schools effects on educational achievement in mathematics and science: 1985-86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
31. National Science Foundation (1982). Women and minorities in science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Science Foundation.
32. National Science Foundation (1990). Women and minorities in science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Science Foundation.
33. Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
34. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. (1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes and meanings. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 318-343). New York: MacMillan Publishing.
35. Page, R. N. (1991). Lower-track classrooms. New York: Teacher's College Press.
36. Page, R., & Valli, L. (1990). Curriculum differentiation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
37. Rakow, S. J. (1985). Minority students in science: Perspectives from the 1981-1982 national assessment in science. Urban Education, 20, 103-113.
38. Rakow, S. J., & Walker, T. (1985). The status of Hispanic-American students in science: Achievement and exposure. Science Education, 69, 557-565.
39. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
40. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage Publications.
41. Tharp, R. C., Estrada, P., Dolton, S., & Yamauchi, L. A. (1999). Teaching transformed: Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony. Oxford: Westview Press.
42. Tobin, K. (1987). A comparison of exemplary and nonexemplary teachers of science and mathematics. In K. Tobin & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Exemplary practice in science and mathematics education (pp. 264-289). Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
43. Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1990). What does it mean to be an exemplary science teacher? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 3-25.
44. Warren, B., Rosebury, A. S., & Conant, F. R. (1989). Cheche Konnen: Science and literacy in language minority classrooms. Eric Document ED326060.
45. Wells, G. (1994). Discourse as a tool in the activity of learning and teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
46. Wells, A. S., & Serna, I. (1996). The politics of culture: Understanding local political resistance to detracking in racially mixed schools. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 93-118.
47. Wilcox, K. (1982). Differential socialization in the classroom: Implications for equal opportunity. In G. Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling (pp. 268-309). New York: Holt, Winston & Reinhardt.