Item analysis by the hierarchical generalized linear model

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 79-93

  Kamata, Akihito ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035532029     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01117.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. (1996). Formulating the Rasch model as a mixed coefficients multinomial logit. In G. Engelhard & M. Wilson (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory and practice (Vol. 3, pp. 143-166). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2. Adams, R. J., Wilson, M., & Wang, W. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(1), 1-23.
3. Adams, R. J., Wilson, M., & Wu, M. (1997). Multilevel item response models: An approach to errors in variables regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22(1), 47-76.
4. Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: An application of the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443-459.
5. Bock, R. D., & Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 35, 179-187.
6. Bock, R. D., Muraki, E., & Pfeiffenberger, W. (1988). Item pool maintenance in the presence of item parameter drift. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25(4), 275-85.
7. Bock, R. D., & Mislevy, R. J. (1989). Duplex design: Giving students a stake in educational assessment. Chicago: Methodology Research Center, NORC.
8. Bock, R. D., & Zimowski, M. F. (1997). Multiple group IRT. In W. van der Linden & R. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 433-448). New York: Springer.
9. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W., (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S.W., & Congdon, R. (1996). HLM: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs [Computer Program]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
11. Fischer, G. H. (1973). The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 37, 359-374.
12. Fischer, G. H. (1983). Logistic latent trait models with linear constraints. Psychometrika, 48(1), 3-26.
13. Fischer, G. H. (1995). Linear logistic test model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 131-155). New York: Springer.
14. Fox, G.J.A., & Glas, C.A.W. (1998). A multi-level IRT model with measurement error in the predictor variables. (Research Report 98-16). Department of Educational Measurement and Data Analysis, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
15. Hedeker, D. & Gibbons, R. D. (1993). MIXOR: A computer program for mixed-effects ordinal probit and logistic regression analysis [Computer Program]. University of Illinois at Chicago.
16. Hoijtink, H., & Boomsma, A. (1996). Statistical inference based on latent ability estimates. Psychometrika, 61(2), 313-330.
17. Kamata, A. (2000). Precision of person ability estimates from one-parameter heirarchical generalized linear logistic model. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
18. Linacre, J. M. (1989). Many-faceted Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.
19. Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 59-71.
20. Muraki, E., & Bock, R. D. (1991). PARSCALE: Parameter scaling of rating data [Computer Program]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
21. McCullagh, R., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.
22. Mislevy, R. J. (1983). Item response models for grouped data. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8(3), 271-288.
23. Mislevy, R. J. & Bock, R. D. (1989). A hierarchical item-response model for educational testing. In R. Bock (Ed.), Multilevel analysis of educational data (pp. 57-74). San Diego: Academic Press.
24. Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948). Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrika, 16, 1-5.
25. Patz, R. J., Junker, B. W., & Johnson, M. S. (1999, April). The hierarchical rater model for rated test items and its applications to large-scale educational assessment data. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
26. Raudenbush, S. W. (1995). Posterior modal estimation for hierarchical generalized linear models with application to dichotomous and count data. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
27. Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1994). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed model methodology in educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 299-311.
28. Sanders, W. L., Saxton, A. M. & Horn, S. P. (1997). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): A quantitative, outcomes-based approach to educational assessment. In J. Milman (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? (pp. 137-162). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
29. Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(4), 323-355.
30. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N. G., & Gilks, W. R. (1996). BUGS 0.5 Examples (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health, Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit.
31. Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1993). Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. In P. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 67-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Zwinderman, A. H. (1991). A generalized Rasch model for manifest predictors. Psychometrika, 56(4), 589-600.
33. Wu, M., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. (1997). ConQuest [Computer Program]. Australian Council of Educational Research.