Acknowledgement trends in the research literature of information science

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 427-433

  Cronin, Blaise ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035531227     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000007089     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bazerman, C. (1984). Modern evolution of the experimental report in physics: spectroscopic articles in Phvsical Review, 1893-1980. Social Studies of Science, 14, 163-196.
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Budd, J.M. (2000). Scholarly productivity of US LIS faculty: an update. Library Quarterly, 70(2), 230-245.
4. Cronin, B. (1991). Let the credits roll: a preliminary examination of the role played by mentors and trusted assessors in disciplinary formation. Journal of Documentation, 47(3), 227-239.
5. Cronin, B. (1995). The scholar's courtesy: the role of acknowledgement in the primary communication process. London: Taylor Graham.
6. Cronin, B. (2001a). Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 27(1), 1-7.
7. Cronin, B. (2001b). Hyperauthorship: a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? JASIST, 52(8), in press.
8. Cronin, B., McKenzie, G., Rubio, L. & Weaver-Wozniak, S. (1993). Accounting for influence: acknowledgements in contemporary sociology. JASIS, 44(7), 406-412.
9. Cronin, B., McKenzie, G. & Stiffler, M. (1992). Patterns of acknowledgement. Journal of Documentation, 47(2), 107-122.
10. Cronin, B. & Weaver-Wozniak, S. (1993). Online access to acknowledgements. In: Proceedings of the National Online Meeting, New York, May 1993. Medford, NJ: Learned Information, 93-98.
11. Davenport, E. & Cronin, B. (in press). Who dunnit? Metatags and hyper-authorship. JASIST.
12. Davis, C.H. & Cronin, B. (1993). Acknowledgments and intellectual indebtedness: a bibliometric conjecture. JASIS, 44(10), 590-592.
13. Heffner, A.G. (1979). Authorship recognition of subordinates in collaborative research. Social Studies of Science, 9, 377-384.
14. Heffner, A.G. (1981). Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines. Scientometrics, 3, 5-12.
15. Koehler, W. et al. (1999). A bibliometric exploration of the demographics of journal articles: fifty years of American Documentation and the Journal of the American Society for Information Science, http://www.ou.edu/cas/slis/ courses/Methods/jbib/ (visited 20 October 2000.)
16. McCain, K.W. (1991). Communication, competition, and secrecy: the production and dissemination of research-related information in genetics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(4), 491-516.
17. Mullins, N.C. (1973). Theories and theory groups in American sociology. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
18. Patel, N. (1973). Collaboration in the professional growth of American sociology. Social Science Information, 12(6), 77-92.