Guidelines for distance education: A case study in Taiwan

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 48-57

  Liang, Chaucer C ^a  

^a YUAN ZE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Case study; Curriculum development; Distance; Illuminative evaluation; Questionnaire; Synchronous; Teachers; Undergraduate; Video

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035530130     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2729.2001.00158.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bourdeau, J. & Bates, A. (1996) Instructional design for distance learning. Journal of Science and Technology, 5, 4, 267-283.
2. Creed, T. (2000) Project ADEPT (Assessment of Distance Education Pedagogy and Technology), http://www.users.csbju.edu/∼tcreed/adept/ (last visited 10 June 2000).
3. Kemp, J. ( 1985) Instructional Design Process. Harper & Row, New York.
4. Navarro, P. & Shoemaker, J. (1999) The power of cyberlearning: an empirical test. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 11, 1, 29-54.
5. Olcott. D. Jr. ( 1996) Aligning distance education practice and academic policy: a framework for institutional change. Continuing Higher Education Review, 60, 1, 27-41.
6. OSSHE (Oregon State System of Higher Education) (1995) Distance education policy framework.
7. Schlosser, C.A. & Anderson, M.L. (1994) Distance Education: Review of the Literature. Iowa State University, Iowa.
8. Spitzer, D. (1998) Rediscovering the social context of distance learning. Educational Technology, 38, 2, 52-56.
9. Wagner, E.D. (1993) Variables affecting distance educational program success. Educational Technology, 33, 4, 28-32.