Book vendor records in the OCLC database: Boon or bane?

Library Resources and Technical Services

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 10-19

  Shedenhelm, Laura D ^a   Burk, Bartley A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035529410     PISSN: 00242527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5860/lrts.45n1.10     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beall, Jeffrey. 2000. The impact of vendor records on cataloging and access in academic libraries. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services 24: 229-37.
2. Erbolato-Ramsey, Christiane, and Mark L. Grover. 1994. Spanish and Portuguese online cataloging: Where do you start from scratch? Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 19, no. 1: 75-87.
3. Ferguson, Bobby. 1991. Upgrading minimal-level records for a statewide database. Technical Services Quarterly 9, no. 2: 31-37.
4. Fox, Mary Anne, and Barbara G. Preece. 1991. Upgrading minimal level monographic records: A study and conclusions. Technical Services Quarterly 8, no. 4: 25-35.
5. Handman, Gary. 1991. I lost it (or found it) at the movies: Public service implications of minimal-level cataloging of audiovisual materials. Technical Services Quarterly 9, no. 2: 39-47.
6. Horny, Karen L. 1991. What you see is what you get (so what do you get?): An administrator looks at minimal-level cataloging. Technical Services Quarterly 9, no. 2: 7-19.
7. Intner, Sheila S. 1994. Taking another look at minimal level cataloging. Technicalities 14, no. 1: 3-5, 11.
8. Johnson, Judith J., and Clair S. Josel. 1981. Quality control and the OCLC data base: A report on error reporting. Library Resources & Technical Services 25, no. 1: 40-47.
9. Marr, Russell. E-mail to the author on Oct. 26, 1998. Marr noted that it was not clear why the vendors lack access to these files.
10. McCallum, Sally. E-mail to the author on June 5, 1997, as forwarded to the Program for Cooperative Cataloging list. September 30, 1999, by Ana Cristan, Acting Team Leader/BIBCO Coordinator, Library of Congress.
11. O'Neill, Edward T., Sally A. Rogers, and W. Michael Oskins. 1993. Characteristics of duplicate records in OCLC's online union catalog. Library Resources & Technical Services 37, no. 1: 59-71.
12. Patton, Glenn. 1991. OCLC's long association with less-than-full cataloging. Technical Services Quarterly 9, no. 2: 21-30.
13. Peet, Terry. 1999. Interviewed by L. Shedenhelm. SALALM Conference, Nashville, Tenn., June 3, 1999. Peet is the former head of the Hispanic Acquisitions Section at the Library of Congress.
14. Preece, Barbara G., and Mary Anne Fox. 1992. Preliminary LC records for monographs in OCLC. Information Technology and Libraries 11, no. 1: 3-9.
15. Romero, Lisa. 1994. Original cataloging errors: A comparison of errors found in entry-level cataloging with errors found in OCLC and RLIN. Technical Services Quarterly 12, no. 2: 13-27. Compare to Cynthia C. Ryan (1978).
16. Ryan, Cynthia C. 1978. A study of errors found in non-MARC cataloging in a machine-assisted system. Journal of Library Automation 11, no. 2: 123-32. Compare to Lisa Romero (1994).
17. Sercan, Cecilia S. 1994. Where has all the copy gone? Latin American imprints in the RLIN database. Library Resources & Technical Services 38, no. 1: 56-59.
18. Stamm, Andrea L. 1996. Minimal level cataloging: Past, present, and future. In Technical services management, 1965-1990: A quarter century of change and a look to the future. Edited by Linda C. Smith and Ruth C. Carter. New York: Haworth Press.
19. Steinhagen, Elizabeth N., and Sharon A. Moynahan. 1998. Catalogers must change! Surviving between the rock and the hard place. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 26, no. 3: 3-20.
20. Wanninger, Patricia Dwyer. 1982. Is the OCLC database too large? A study of the effect of duplicate records in the OCLC system. Library Resources & Technical Services 26, no. 4: 353-61.
21. Weitz, Jay. 2000a. E-mail to the author. June 9, 11:09 A.M.
22. -. 2000b. E-mail to the author. June 9, 11:58 A.M.