Confidentiality and peer review: The paradox of secrecy in academe

Review of Higher Education

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 163-183

  Baez, Benjamin ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035528608     PISSN: 01625748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2002.0002     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Aisenberg, N., & Harrington, M. (1988). Women of academe: Outsiders in the sacred grove. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
2. Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy. New York: Monthly Review Press.
3. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). (1989). Brief of the AAUP, amicus curiae, non-aligned. 1988 U.S. Briefs 493. Retrieved from LEXIS-NEXIS January 1, 2001.
4. American Association of University Professors. (1992, July/August). Access to faculty personnel files. Academe, 24-29.
5. Baez, B., & Centra, J. A. (1995). Tenure, promotion, and reappointments: Legal and administrative implications. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 1. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
6. Baez, B., & Slaughter, S. (2001). Academic freedom and federal courts in the 1990s: The legitimation of the conservative entrepreneurial state. In J. C. Smart & W. G.Tierney (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 16, pp. 73-118). Bronx, NY: Agathon Press.
7. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
8. Baglione, F. M. (1987). Title VII and the tenure decision: The need for a qualified academic freedom privilege protecting confidential peer review materials in university employment discrimination cases. Suffolk University Law Review, 27, 691-721.
9. Barrow, C. L. H. (1990). Academic freedom and the university Title VII suit after University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC and Brown v. Trustees of Boston University. Vanderbilt Law Review, 43, 1571-1576.
10. Bok, S. (1982). Secrets: On the ethics of concealment and revelation. New York: Pantheon Books.
11. Brown, R. S., & Kurland, J. E. (1990). Academic tenure and academic freedom. Law and Contemporary Problems, 53, 325-355.
12. Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13. Byrne, J. P. (1989). Academic freedom: A "special concern of the First Amendment." Yale Law Journal, 99, 251-340.
14. Cleveland, H. (1985). The costs and benefits of openness: Sunshine laws and higher education. Journal of College and University Law, 12, 127-173.
15. Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Copeland, J. D., & Murry, J. W. (1996). Getting tossed from the ivory tower: The legal implications of evaluating faculty performance. Missouri Law Review, 61, 233-327.
17. Corngold, E. (1983). Title VII and confidentiality in the university. Journal of Law and Education, 12, 587-607.
18. DeLano, M. (1987). Discovery in university employment discrimination suits: Should peer review materials be privileged? Journal of College and University Law, 14, 121-151.
19. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
20. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books.
21. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
22. Galle. W. P., et al. (1993, September/October). Tenure and promotion after Penn vs. EEOC. Academe, 19-26.
23. Gerberry, R. A. (1995). James v. Ohio State University: Ohio declares promotion and tenure records of state-supported universities and colleges public records subject to disclosure. Akron Law Review, 29, 93-112.
24. Giddens, A. (1987). Sociology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
25. Glidden, H. (1997, May/June). Does confidentiality serve the educational mission? Academe, 32-34.
26. Goldberg, B. A. (1984). The peer review privilege: A law in search of a valid policy. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 10, 151-167.
27. Hamilton, E. (1969). Mythology. New York: New American Library.
28. Harvard Law Review. (1985). Development in law - privileged communication: Institutional privileges. Harvard Law Review, 98, 1592-1629.
29. Harvard University. (1989). Motion and brief of president and fellows of Harvard College as amicus curiae in support of petitioner. 1988 U.S. Briefs 493. Retrieved from LEXIS-NEXIS January 1, 2001.
30. In Re Dinnan. (1981). 661 F.2d. 426 (5th Cir.).
31. Lee, B. A. (1990). Peer review confidentiality: Is it still possible? Washington, DC: National Association of College and University Attorneys.
32. Lee, B. A., & Olswang, S. G. (1992, February 9-12). Peer review in the sunshine: Legal and practical issues. Paper presented at the 13th Annual National Conference on Law and Higher Education, Clearwater Beach, FL.
33. Nochlin, L., & Solomon-Godeau, A. (2000, December). Sins of the father. Art in America, 92-101.
34. Rabban, D. M. (1993). A functional analysis of individual and institutional academic freedom under the first amendment. In W. W. Van Alstyne (Ed.), Freedom and tenure in the academy (pp. 227-301). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
35. Remler, C. (1982). Academic freedom privilege: An excessive solution to the problem of protecting confidentiality. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 51, 326-352.
36. Scheutzow, S. O. (1999). State medical peer review: High cost but no benefit - is it time for a change? American Journal of Law & Medicine, 25, 7-60.
37. Scott, J. W. (1994). Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism. In S. Seidman (Ed.), The postmodern turn: New perspectives on social theory (pp. 282-298). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39. Stanford University et al. (1989). Brief of Stanford University, Yale University, and Princeton University as amici curiae in support of petitioner. 1988 U.S. Briefs 493. Retrieved from LEXIS-NEXIS January 1, 2001.
40. Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957). Retrieved from LEXIS-NEXIS January 1, 2001.
41. Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: community and socialization in academe. New York: State University of New York.
42. University of Pennsylvania. (1989). Brief of petitioner. 1988 U.S. Briefs 493. Retrieved from LEXIS-NEXIS January 1, 2001.
43. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1990) 493 U.S. 182.
44. Turner, C. S. V., & Myers, S. L. (2000). Faculty of color in academe: Bittersweet success. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
45. Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2d ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
46. Weeks, K. M. (1990). The peer review process: Confidentiality and disclosure. Journal of Higher Education, 61, 198-219.
47. Zipin, L. (1998). Looking for sentient life in discursive practices: The question of human agency in critical theories and school research. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault's challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 319-347). New York: Teachers College Press.