|
|
Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 459-460
|
|
Access blood flow: debate continues.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY;
CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EQUIPMENT;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
NOTE;
PROBABILITY;
RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
THROMBOSIS;
VASCULAR RESISTANCE;
BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY;
CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS;
EQUIPMENT SAFETY;
HUMANS;
PROBABILITY;
RENAL DIALYSIS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
THROMBOSIS;
VASCULAR RESISTANCE;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
|
EID: 0035523895
PISSN: 08940959
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-139x.2001.0113a.x Document Type: Note |
|
Times cited : (3)
|
|
References (0)
|
