Validating a new process tracing method for decision making

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 496-512

  Jasper, J D ^a,c   Levin, Irwin P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOMETRY;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0035523124     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195408     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ANDERSON, N. H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2. ANDERSON, N. H., & ZALINSKI, J. (1988). Functional measurement approach to self-estimation in multiattribute evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1, 191-221.
3. BEACH, L. R. (1993). Broadening the definition of decision making: The role of prechoice screening of options. Psychological Science, 4, 215-220.
4. BOCKENHOLT, U., & HYNAN, L. S. (1994). Caveats on a process tracing measure and a remedy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1, 103-117.
5. CARROLL, J. S., & PAYNE, J. M. (1977). Judgements about crime and the criminal: A model and a method for investigating parole decisions. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Perspectives in law and psychology: The criminal justice system (Vol. 1, pp. 41-55). New York: Plenum.
6. ERICSSON, K. A., & SIMON, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. FIDLER, E. J. (1983). The reliability and validity of concurrent, retro-spective, and interpretive verbal reports: An experimental study. In P. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Eds.), Analysing and aiding decision processes (pp. 429-440). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. JASPER, J. D. (2002). How people deal with missing information: Insights from process tracing. Manuscript in preparation.
9. JASPER, J. D., & SHAPIRO, J. (2001). MouseTrace: A better mousetrap for catching decision processes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10. JOHNSON, E. J., PAYNE, J. W., SCHKADE, D. A., & BETTMAN, J. R. (1991). Monitoring information processing and decisions: The Mouselab system. Unpublished manuscript. Durham, NC: Duke University, Fuqua School of Business, Center for Decision Studies.
11. JUDD, C. M., & MCCLELLAND, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model-comparison approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
12. LEVIN, I. P., HUNEKE, M. E., & JASPER, J. D. (2000). Information processing at successive stages of decision making: Need-for-cognition and inclusion-exclusion effects. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 82, 171-193.
13. LEVIN, I. P., & JASPER, J. D. (1995). Phased narrowing: A new process tracing method for decision making. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 64, 1-8.
14. LEVIN, I. P., & JASPER, J. D. (1996). An experimental analysis of nationalistic tendencies in consumer decision processes: The case of the multi-national product. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 17-30.
15. LEVIN, I. P., JASPER, J. D., & FORBES, W. S. (1998). Choosing versus rejecting options at different stages of decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 193-210.
16. LEVIN, I. P., JASPER, J. D., & GAETH, G. J. (1996). Measuring the effects of framing country-of-origin information: A process tracing approach. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 385-389.
17. LEVIN, I. P., JASPER, J. D., MITTELSTAEDT, J. D., & GAETH, G. J. (1993). Attitudes toward "buy America first" and preferences for American and Japanese cars: A different role for country-of-origin information. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 625-629.
18. LEVIN, I. P., JOHNSON, R. D., & JASPER, J. D. (December, 1993). The role of nationalism in the consumer choice process: Comparison between the U. S. and Canada. In G. S. Albaum et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Cross-Cultural Consumer and Business Studies.
19. NEDUNGADI, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choices without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research. 17, 245-253.
20. OLSHAVSKY, R. W. (1979). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: A replication and extension. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 24, 300-316.
21. PAYNE, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 16, 366-387.
22. PAYNE, J. W., BETTMAN, J. R., & JOHNSON, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 534-552.
23. PAYNE, J. W., BETTMAN, J. R., & JOHNSON, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. ROBERTS, J. [H.] (1989). A grounded model of consideration set size and composition. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 749-757.
25. ROBERTS, J. H., & LATTIN, J. M. (1991). Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 429-440.
26. SHIMP, T. A., & SHARMA, S. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research 24, 280-289.
27. SHOCKER, A. D., BEN-AKIVA, M., BOCCARA, B., & NEDUNGADI, P. (1991). Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions. Marketing Letters, 2, 181-197.
28. SLOVIC, P., & LICHTENSTEIN, S. (1971). Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 6, 649-744.
29. SMEAD, R. J., WILCOX, J. B., & WILKES, R. E. (1981). How valid are product descriptions and protocols in choice experiments? Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 37-42.
30. ZHU, S., & ANDERSON, N. H. (1991). Self-estimation of weight parameter in multi-attribute analysis. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 48, 36-54.